Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26766544›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Mutation Detection in Patients with Retinal Dystrophies Using Targeted Next Generation Sequencing.

Nicole Weisschuh, Anja K Mayer, Tim M Strom, Susanne Kohl, Nicola Glöckle, Max Schubach, Sten Andreasson, Antje Bernd, David G Birch, Christian P Hamel and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Inherited Retinal Diseases Due toInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 7 countries.

Nicole WeisschuhMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Anja K MayerMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Tim M StromInstitute of Human Genetics, Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen, Neuherberg, Germany.
Susanne KohlMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Nicola GlöckleCeGaT GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany.
Max SchubachInstitute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Charité - Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sten AndreassonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Antje BerndUniversity Eye Hospital, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
David G BirchThe Retina Foundation of the Southwest, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Christian P HamelGenetic Sensory Diseases, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
John R HeckenlivelyDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Samuel G JacobsonScheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Christina KammeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulrich KellnerRare Retinal Disease Center, AugenZentrum Siegburg, MVZ ADTC Siegburg GmbH, Siegburg, Germany.
Erdmute KunstmannInstitute of Human Genetics, Julius-Maximilian-University, Wuerzburg, Germany.
Pietro MaffeiDepartment of Medicine, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Charlotte M ReiffEye Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Klaus RohrschneiderDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas RosenbergNational Eye Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark.
Günther RudolphUniversity Eye Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Rita VámosDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Balázs VarsányiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Richard G WeleberCasey Eye Institute, Oregon Retinal Degeneration Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Bernd WissingerMolecular Genetics Laboratory, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
STZ eyetrial · DELund University · SESemmelweis University · HUCeGaT (Germany) · DECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEGlostrup Hospital · DKHeidelberg University · DEHelmholtz Zentrum München · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEMichigan United · USOregon Health & Science University · USPenn Presbyterian Medical Center · USRetina Foundation of the Southwest · USUniversity of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal dystrophies (RD) constitute a group of blinding diseases that are characterized by clinical variability and pronounced genetic heterogeneity. The different nonsyndromic and syndromic forms of RD can be attributed to mutations in more than 200 genes. Consequently, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies are among the most promising approaches to identify mutations in RD. We screened a large cohort of patients comprising 89 independent cases and families with various subforms of RD applying different NGS platforms. While mutation screening in 50 cases was performed using a RD gene capture panel, 47 cases were analyzed using whole exome sequencing. One family was analyzed using whole genome sequencing. A detection rate of 61% was achieved including mutations in 34 known and two novel RD genes. A total of 69 distinct mutations were identified, including 39 novel mutations. Notably, genetic findings in several families were not consistent with the initial clinical diagnosis. Clinical reassessment resulted in refinement of the clinical diagnosis in some of these families and confirmed the broad clinical spectrum associated with mutations in RD genes.

Indexed as

MutationDNA Copy Number VariationsExomeEye ProteinsFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMutation RatePedigreePhenotypeRetinal DystrophiesEye ProteinsPRPF31 protein, humanRPGR protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26766544
PMCPMC4713063
OpenAlexW2238860309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.