Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26765951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparison of Irradiation and Wolbachia Based Approaches for Sterile-Male Strategies Targeting Aedes albopictus.

Célestine M Atyame, Pierrick Labbé, Cyrille Lebon, Mylène Weill, Riccardo Moretti, Francesca Marini, Louis Clément Gouagna, Maurizio Calvitti, Pablo Tortosa

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Célestine M AtyameCRVOI, Ste Clotilde, Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, Réunion Island, France.
Pierrick LabbéCNRS, IRD, ISEM - UMR 5554, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Cyrille LebonCRVOI, Ste Clotilde, Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, Réunion Island, France.
Mylène WeillCNRS, IRD, ISEM - UMR 5554, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Riccardo MorettiENEA, CR Casaccia, Biotecnologies and Agro-industry Division, Roma, Italy.
Francesca MariniENEA, CR Casaccia, Biotecnologies and Agro-industry Division, Roma, Italy.
Louis Clément GouagnaCRVOI, Ste Clotilde, Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, Réunion Island, France.
Maurizio CalvittiENEA, CR Casaccia, Biotecnologies and Agro-industry Division, Roma, Italy.
Pablo TortosaCRVOI, Ste Clotilde, Plateforme de Recherche CYROI, Réunion Island, France.
National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITInserm · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global expansion of Aedes albopictus together with the absence of vaccines for most of the arboviruses transmitted by this mosquito has stimulated the development of sterile-male strategies aiming at controlling disease transmission through the suppression of natural vector populations. In this context, two environmentally friendly control strategies, namely the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) and the Wolbachia-based Incompatible Insect Technique (IIT) are currently being developed in several laboratories worldwide. So far however, there is a lack of comparative assessment of these strategies under the same controlled conditions. Here, we compared the mating capacities, i.e. insemination capacity, sterilization capacity and mating competitiveness of irradiated (35 Gy) and incompatible Ae. albopictus males at different ages and ratios under laboratory controlled conditions. Our data show that there was no significant difference in insemination capacity of irradiated and incompatible males, both male types showing lower capacities than untreated males at 1 day but recovering full capacity within 5 days following emergence. Regarding mating competitiveness trials, a global observed trend is that incompatible males tend to induce a lower hatching rate than irradiated males in cage controlled confrontations. More specifically, incompatible males were found more competitive than irradiated males in 5:1 ratio regardless of age, while irradiated males were only found more competitive than incompatible males in the 1:1 ratio at 10 days old. Overall, under the tested conditions, IIT seemed to be slightly more effective than SIT. However, considering that a single strategy will likely not be adapted to all environments, our data stimulates the need for comparative assessments of distinct strategies in up-scaled conditions in order to identify the most suitable and safe sterilizing technology to be implemented in a specific environmental setting and to identify the parameters requiring fine tuning in order to reach optimal release conditions.

Indexed as

Radiation, IonizingWolbachiaAedesAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMosquito Control

Identifiers

PMID26765951
PMCPMC4713058
OpenAlexW2239984511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.