Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26765847›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Automated Entire Thrombus Density Measurements for Robust and Comprehensive Thrombus Characterization in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Emilie M M Santos, Wiro J Niessen, Albert J Yoo, Olvert A Berkhemer, Ludo F Beenen, Charles B Majoie, Henk A Marquering, MR CLEAN investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emilie M M SantosDept. of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wiro J NiessenDept. of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Albert J YooDepartment of Radiology, Division of Interventional Neuroradiology, Texas Stroke Institute, Plano, Texas, United States of America.
Olvert A BerkhemerDept. of Radiology, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ludo F BeenenDept. of Radiology, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Charles B MajoieDept. of Radiology, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Henk A MarqueringDept. of Radiology, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
MR CLEAN investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeIn acute ischemic stroke (AIS) management, CT-based thrombus density has been associated with treatment success. However, currently used thrombus measurements are prone to inter-observer variability and oversimplify the heterogeneous thrombus composition. Our aim was first to introduce an automated method to assess the entire thrombus density and then to compare the measured entire thrombus density with respect to current standard manual measurements. MATERIALS AND

methodIn 135 AIS patients, the density distribution of the entire thrombus was determined. Density distributions were described using medians, interquartile ranges (IQR), kurtosis, and skewedness. Differences between the median of entire thrombus measurements and commonly applied manual measurements using 3 regions of interest were determined using linear regression.

resultsDensity distributions varied considerably with medians ranging from 20.0 to 62.8 HU and IQRs ranging from 9.3 to 55.8 HU. The average median of the thrombus density distributions (43.5 ± 10.2 HU) was lower than the manual assessment (49.6 ± 8.0 HU) (p<0.05). The difference between manual measurements and median density of entire thrombus decreased with increasing density (r = 0.64; p<0.05), revealing relatively higher manual measurements for low density thrombi such that manual density measurement tend overestimates the real thrombus density.

conclusionsAutomatic measurements of the full thrombus expose a wide variety of thrombi density distribution, which is not grasped with currently used manual measurement. Furthermore, discrimination of low and high density thrombi is improved with the automated method.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonAgedCarotid Artery, InternalCerebral ArteriesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeThrombosisTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26765847
PMCPMC4713144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.