ArticleMedicine2016
Status and Perspectives of Clinical Modes in Surgical Patients With Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Proper Selection of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs between the Medical Service and Medical Intervence - Is It Time to Do?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2019Review
- [Establishment and Optimization of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery System for Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017Review
- [Enhanced Recovery after Surgery from Theory to Practice What do We Need to Do?]Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the association between the clinical characteristics and clinical modes of surgically treated lung cancer patients, we conducted a retrospective study with 1097 lung cancer patients receiving pulmonary resection between 2012 and 2013.A physical examination or screening (PES) group (n = 267) and a symptomatic (SY) group (n = 830) were established depending on the new clinical mode (sequence of physical examination, early detection and sequential medical treatment) and the conventional mode (hospitalization due to occurrence of relevant symptoms), respectively.A higher proportion of patients referred to our unit directly form a junior medical unit is found in PES group (43.8%, 117/267 vs 13.6%, 113/830) (P < 0.001) and 37.5% (100/267) patients in PES group spent <1 months from detection or first medical visit to diagnosis compared with 15.4% (128/830) patient in SY group (P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of PES patients versus SY patients received video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) resection (67.8%, 183/267 vs 42.6%, 352/830; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of PES patients versus SY patients chose sublobar resection (16.9%, 45/267 vs 7.6%, 63/830; P < 0.001). A significantly higher proportion of PES patients versus SY patients are at stage 0 or I (64.4%, 172/267 vs 40.7%, 338/830; P < 0.000). The postoperative incidence rate of complications in 30 days is significantly higher in SY group than in PES group (34.9% vs 27.3%; P = 0.022).Helping to early diagnosis and surgical treatment, early tumor detection via PES may contribute to significantly higher proportions of early-stage lung cancer, use of VATS pulmonary resection, and sublobectomy as well as lower complication rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.