ArticleEpilepsia2016
Health and economic benefits of public financing of epilepsy treatment in India: An agent-based simulation model.
Article in Epilepsia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 182 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incorporating Equity Concerns in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Systematic Literature Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2022Pooled it
- Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.Mediators of inflammation · 2022Pooled it
- Comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios: A systematic review of cost-effectiveness evidence for health policy decisions in India.Frontiers in public health · 2022Pooled it
- Effects of valproic acid on skeletal metabolism in children with epilepsy: a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis based on 14 studies.BMC pediatrics · 2020Pooled it
- Global, regional, and national burden of epilepsy, 1990-2021: a Global Burden of Disease study.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Assessing the efficacy and safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation and vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- Comparative Assessment of Quality of Life and Serum S100B in Epilepsy Treated with Newer and Conventional Drugs: A Pharmacoeconomic Perspective.Journal of epilepsy research · 2025Article
- Integrated Pharmacoepigenomic Analysis Uncovers the Impact of Antiseizure Medications on Developmental Pathways and the Protective Effect of Folic Acid.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of idiopathic epilepsy in older adults, 1990-2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Routine immunization againstThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024Article
- A scheme combining feature fusion and hybrid deep learning models for epileptic seizure detection and prediction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Global, regional, and national time trends in the burden of epilepsy, 1990-2019: an age-period-cohort analysis for the global burden of disease 2019 study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Article
- Central and Peripheral Inflammation: A Common Factor Causing Addictive and Neurological Disorders and Aging-Related Pathologies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Lived experience of young people with epilepsy in Bahir Dar city government hospitals, Ethiopia, a qualitative interview study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Genetic Knockout of TRPM2 Increases Neuronal Excitability of Hippocampal Neurons by Inhibiting Kv7 Channel in Epilepsy.Molecular neurobiology · 2022Article
- Etiology of new-onset seizures in adult patients of different age groups presenting to the emergency department in North India and their outcomes.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2022Article
- Pharmacoeconomics Aspects of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pediatric Patients with Epilepsy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Enhanced Feature Extraction-based CNN Approach for Epileptic Seizure Detection from EEG Signals.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- A rise in saliva and urine pH in children withFrontiers in neurology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAn estimated 6-10 million people in India live with active epilepsy, and less than half are treated. We analyze the health and economic benefits of three scenarios of publicly financed national epilepsy programs that provide: (1) first-line antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs), (2) first- and second-line AEDs, and (3) first- and second-line AEDs and surgery.
methodsWe model the prevalence and distribution of epilepsy in India using IndiaSim, an agent-based, simulation model of the Indian population. Agents in the model are disease-free or in one of three disease states: untreated with seizures, treated with seizures, and treated without seizures. Outcome measures include the proportion of the population that has epilepsy and is untreated, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) averted, and cost per DALY averted. Economic benefit measures estimated include out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure averted and money-metric value of insurance.
resultsAll three scenarios represent a cost-effective use of resources and would avert 800,000-1 million DALYs per year in India relative to the current scenario. However, especially in poor regions and populations, scenario 1 (which publicly finances only first-line therapy) does not decrease the OOP expenditure or provide financial risk protection if we include care-seeking costs. The OOP expenditure averted increases from scenarios 1 through 3, and the money-metric value of insurance follows a similar trend between scenarios and typically decreases with wealth. In the first 10 years of scenarios 2 and 3, households avert on average over US$80 million per year in medical expenditure. SIGNIFICANCE: Expanding and publicly financing epilepsy treatment in India averts substantial disease burden. A universal public finance policy that covers only first-line AEDs may not provide significant financial risk protection. Covering costs for both first- and second-line therapy and other medical costs alleviates the financial burden from epilepsy and is cost-effective across wealth quintiles and in all Indian states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.