Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26764256›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2016

Changes Over Time in Absolute and Relative Socioeconomic Differences in Smoking: A Comparison of Cohort Studies From Britain, Finland, and Japan.

Eero Lahelma, Olli Pietiläinen, Jane Ferrie, Mika Kivimäki, Jouni Lahti, Michael Marmot, Ossi Rahkonen, Michikazu Sekine, Martin Shipley, Takashi Tatsuse and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Eero LahelmaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; eero.lahelma@helsinki.fi.
Olli PietiläinenDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
Jane FerrieDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; School of Community and Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK;
Mika KivimäkiDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK; Centre of Expertise for Development of Work and Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland;
Jouni LahtiDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
Michael MarmotDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK;
Ossi RahkonenDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
Michikazu SekineDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Martin ShipleyDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK;
Takashi TatsuseDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan.
Tea LallukkaDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; Centre of Expertise for Development of Work and Organizations, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland;
University of Helsinki · FIFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FIUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Toyama · JPUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Socio-economic status and heterogeneity in agingR01AG013196 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON INST OF NEUROLOGY · PI MARMOT, MICHAEL G, SINGH-MANOUX, ARCHANA · 1996 to 2013
$3.5M
Socioeconomic gradient in CHD in early old ageR01HL036310 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF LONDON · PI KIVIMAKI, MIKA J, MARMOT, MICHAEL G · 1986 to 2012
$3.1M
British Heart Foundation RG/07/008/23674British Heart Foundation RG/13/2/30098Medical Research Council G0100222Medical Research Council G0601647Medical Research Council G0701830Medical Research Council G0902037Medical Research Council G1000616Medical Research Council G19/35Medical Research Council G8802774Medical Research Council K013351Medical Research Council MR/K013351/1NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL036310NIA NIH HHS R01 AG013196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSocioeconomic differences in smoking over time and across national contexts are poorly understood. We assessed the magnitude of relative and absolute social class differences in smoking in cohorts from Britain, Finland, and Japan over 5-7 years.

methodsThe British Whitehall II study (n = 4350), Finnish Helsinki Health Study (n = 6328), and Japanese Civil Servants Study (n = 1993) all included employed men and women aged 35-68 at baseline in 1997-2002. Follow-up was in 2003-2007 (mean follow-up 5.1, 6.5, and 3.6 years, respectively). Occupational social class (managers, professionals and clerical employees) was measured at baseline. Current smoking and covariates (age, marital status, body mass index, and self-rated health) were measured at baseline and follow-up. We assessed relative social class differences using the Relative Index of Inequality and absolute differences using the Slope Index of Inequality.

resultsSocial class differences in smoking were found in Britain and Finland, but not in Japan. Age-adjusted relative differences at baseline ranged from Relative Index of Inequality 3.08 (95% confidence interval 1.99-4.78) among Finnish men to 2.32 (1.24-4.32) among British women, with differences at follow-up greater by 8%-58%. Absolute differences remained stable and varied from Slope Index of Inequality 0.27 (0.15-0.40) among Finnish men to 0.10 (0.03-0.16) among British women. Further adjustment for covariates had modest effects on inequality indices.

conclusionsLarge social class differences in smoking persisted among British and Finnish men and women, with widening tendencies in relative differences over time. No differences could be confirmed among Japanese men or women. IMPLICATIONS: Changes over time in social class differences in smoking are poorly understood across countries. Our study focused on employees from Britain, Finland and Japan, and found relative and absolute and class differences among British and Finnish men and women. Key covariates had modest effects on the differences. Relative differences tended to widen over the 4- to 7-year follow-up, whereas absolute differences remained stable. In contrast, class differences in smoking among Japanese men or women were not found. Britain and Finland are at the late stage of the smoking epidemic model, whereas Japan may not follow the same model.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedSmokingSmoking PreventionSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26764256
PMCPMC4941597
OpenAlexW2322065091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.