Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26764165›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and molecular mutagenesis2016

Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Steven M Bryce, Derek T Bernacki, Jeffrey C Bemis, Stephen D Dertinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and molecular mutagenesis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. New Approach Methods in Genetic Toxicology.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Development of a TK6-derived cell line expressing four human cytochrome P450s for genotoxicity testing.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. In vitro human cell-based aneugen molecular mechanism assay.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Steven M BryceLitron Laboratories, 3500 Winton Place, Rochester, New York.
Derek T BernackiLitron Laboratories, 3500 Winton Place, Rochester, New York.
Jeffrey C BemisLitron Laboratories, 3500 Winton Place, Rochester, New York.
Stephen D DertingerLitron Laboratories, 3500 Winton Place, Rochester, New York.

Funding

Biomarker Matrix for Genotoxicity Mode of ActionR44ES024039 · NIEHS · LITRON LABORATORIES, LTD. · PI BEMIS, JEFFREY C, DERTINGER, STEPHEN D · 2014 to 2016
$1.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS R44 ES024039NIEHS NIH HHS R44ES024039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several endpoints associated with cellular responses to DNA damage as well as overt cytotoxicity were multiplexed into a miniaturized, "add and read" type flow cytometric assay. Reagents included a detergent to liberate nuclei, RNase and propidium iodide to serve as a pan-DNA dye, fluorescent antibodies against γH2AX, phospho-histone H3, and p53, and fluorescent microspheres for absolute nuclei counts. The assay was applied to TK6 cells and 67 diverse reference chemicals that served as a training set. Exposure was for 24 hrs in 96-well plates, and unless precipitation or foreknowledge about cytotoxicity suggested otherwise, the highest concentration was 1 mM. At 4- and 24-hrs aliquots were removed and added to microtiter plates containing the reagent mix. Following a brief incubation period robotic sampling facilitated walk-away data acquisition. Univariate analyses identified biomarkers and time points that were valuable for classifying agents into one of three groups: clastogenic, aneugenic, or non-genotoxic. These mode of action predictions were optimized with a forward-stepping process that considered Wald test p-values, receiver operator characteristic curves, and pseudo R(2) values, among others. A particularly high performing multinomial logistic regression model was comprised of four factors: 4 hr γH2AX and phospho-histone H3 values, and 24 hr p53 and polyploidy values. For the training set chemicals, the four-factor model resulted in 94% concordance with our a priori classifications. Cross validation occurred via a leave-one-out approach, and in this case 91% concordance was observed. A test set of 17 chemicals that were not used to construct the model were evaluated, some of which utilized a short-term treatment in the presence of a metabolic activation system, and in 16 cases mode of action was correctly predicted. These initial results are encouraging as they suggest a machine learning strategy can be used to rapidly and reliably predict new chemicals' genotoxic mode of action based on data from an efficient and highly scalable multiplexed assay.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsAneugensAutomation, LaboratoryBiomarkersCell LineDNA DamageFlow CytometryHistonesHumansMutagenicity TestsMutagensReproducibility of ResultsTumor Suppressor Protein p53AneugensBiomarkersH2AX protein, humanHistonesMutagensTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53flow cytometryH2AXmode of actionp53phospho-histone H3

Identifiers

PMID26764165
PMCPMC4792721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.