Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26764057›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology2016

A case of mistaken identity: are reactive oxygen species actually reactive sulfide species?

Eric R DeLeon, Yan Gao, Evelyn Huang, Maaz Arif, Nitin Arora, Alexander Divietro, Shivali Patel, Kenneth R Olson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antioxidant Activity in Extracts fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. SOD1 is an essential HProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Reactive Sulfur Species: A New Redox Player in Cardiovascular Pathophysiology.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reactivity of Small Oxoacids of Sulfur.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric R DeLeonIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Yan GaoIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and.
Evelyn HuangIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana.
Maaz ArifIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and.
Nitin AroraIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and.
Alexander DivietroIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and.
Shivali PatelIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and.
Kenneth R OlsonIndiana University School of Medicine-South Bend Center, South Bend, Indiana; and kolson@nd.edu.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University South Bend · USUniversity of Notre Dame · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stepwise one-electron reduction of oxygen to water produces reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are chemically and biochemically similar to reactive sulfide species (RSS) derived from one-electron oxidations of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur. Both ROS and RSS are endogenously generated and signal via protein thiols. Given the similarities between ROS and RSS, we wondered whether extant methods for measuring the former would also detect the latter. Here, we compared ROS to RSS sensitivity of five common ROS methods: redox-sensitive green fluorescent protein (roGFP), 2', 7'-dihydrodichlorofluorescein, MitoSox Red, Amplex Red, and amperometric electrodes. All methods detected RSS and were as, or more, sensitive to RSS than to ROS. roGFP, arguably the "gold standard" for ROS measurement, was more than 200-fold more sensitive to the mixed polysulfide H2Sn(n = 1-8) than to H2O2 These findings suggest that RSS may be far more prevalent in intracellular signaling than previously appreciated and that the contribution of ROS may be overestimated. This conclusion is further supported by the observation that estimated daily sulfur metabolism and ROS production are approximately equal and the fact that both RSS and antioxidant mechanisms have been present since the origin of life, nearly 4 billion years ago, long before the rise in environmental oxygen 600 million years ago. Although ROS are assumed to be the most biologically relevant oxidants, our results question this paradigm. We also anticipate our findings will direct attention toward development of novel and clinically relevant anti-(RSS)-oxidants.

Indexed as

ConductometryEscherichia coliOxidative StressOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, FluorescenceSubcellular FractionsSulfidesOxygenReactive Oxygen SpeciesSulfidesanalytical methodshydrogen peroxidepolysulfidessulfidesuperoxide

Identifiers

PMID26764057
PMCPMC4867382
OpenAlexW2236593581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.