Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763976›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

FRAMA: from RNA-seq data to annotated mRNA assemblies.

Martin Bens, Arne Sahm, Marco Groth, Niels Jahn, Michaela Morhart, Susanne Holtze, Thomas B Hildebrandt, Matthias Platzer, Karol Szafranski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. CAARS: comparative assembly and annotation of RNA-Seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unraveling the message: insights into comparative genomics of the naked mole-rat.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martin BensLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. mbens@fli-leibniz.de.
Arne SahmLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. asahm@fli-leibniz.de.
Marco GrothLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. mgroth@fli-leibniz.de.
Niels JahnLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. nielsj@fli-leibniz.de.
Michaela MorhartLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany. morhart@izw-berlin.de.
Susanne HoltzeLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany. holtze@izw-berlin.de.
Thomas B HildebrandtLeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Straße 17, 10315, Berlin, Germany. hildebrandt@izw-berlin.de.
Matthias PlatzerLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. mplatzer@fli-leibniz.de.
Karol SzafranskiLeibniz Institute on Ageing - Fritz Lipmann Institute, Beutenbergstr. 11, 07745, Jena, Germany. szafrans@fli-leibniz.de.
Leibniz Institute on Aging - Fritz Lipmann Institute (FLI) · DELeibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvances in second-generation sequencing of RNA made a near-complete characterization of transcriptomes affordable. However, the reconstruction of full-length mRNAs via de novo RNA-seq assembly is still difficult due to the complexity of eukaryote transcriptomes with highly similar paralogs and multiple alternative splice variants. Here, we present FRAMA, a genome-independent annotation tool for de novo mRNA assemblies that addresses several post-assembly tasks, such as reduction of contig redundancy, ortholog assignment, correction of misassembled transcripts, scaffolding of fragmented transcripts and coding sequence identification.

resultsWe applied FRAMA to assemble and annotate the transcriptome of the naked mole-rat and assess the quality of the obtained compilation of transcripts with the aid of publicy available naked mole-rat gene annotations. Based on a de novo transcriptome assembly (Trinity), FRAMA annotated 21,984 naked mole-rat mRNAs (12,100 full-length CDSs), corresponding to 16,887 genes. The scaffolding of 3488 genes increased the median sequence information 1.27-fold. In total, FRAMA detected and corrected 4774 misassembled genes, which were predominantly caused by fusion of genes. A comparison with three different sources of naked mole-rat transcripts reveals that FRAMA's gene models are better supported by RNA-seq data than any other transcript set. Further, our results demonstrate the competitiveness of FRAMA to state of the art genome-based transcript reconstruction approaches.

conclusionFRAMA realizes the de novo construction of a low-redundant transcript catalog for eukaryotes, including the extension and refinement of transcripts. Thereby, results delivered by FRAMA provide the basis for comprehensive downstream analyses like gene expression studies or comparative transcriptomics. FRAMA is available at https://github.com/gengit/FRAMA .

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareAnimalsComputational BiologyGenomeMolecular Sequence AnnotationMole RatsOpen Reading FramesRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26763976
PMCPMC4712544
OpenAlexW2239969570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.