Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763966›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Depletion of Human DNA in Spiked Clinical Specimens for Improvement of Sensitivity of Pathogen Detection by Next-Generation Sequencing.

Mohammad R Hasan, Arun Rawat, Patrick Tang, Puthen V Jithesh, Eva Thomas, Rusung Tan, Peter Tilley

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04864873 (An External Evaluation of a Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing Workflow for Infection Diagnosis Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.), which is not on this map. Cited by 156 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04864873 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

An External Evaluation of a Metagenomic Next Generation Sequencing Workflow for Infection Diagnosis Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing.

TypeinterventionalSponsorCapital and Coast District Health boardRan2021 to 2022Enrolled400ConditionsBacterial InfectionsArmsMetagenomic next generation sequencing using Oxford Nanopore, Standard microbiological diagnostic pathway
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 250 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Effects of aquaculture practices onApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Typing ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad R HasanDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Doha, Qatar mhasan@sidra.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-7949
Arun RawatDivision of Biomedical Informatics Research, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha Qatar.
Patrick TangDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Puthen V JitheshDivision of Biomedical Informatics Research, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha Qatar.
Eva ThomasDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar.
Rusung TanDepartment of Pathology, Sidra Medical and Research Center, Doha, Qatar Children's and Women's Health Centre of BC, PHSA, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Peter TilleyChildren's and Women's Health Centre of BC, PHSA, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sidra Medical and Research Center · QAChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology has shown promise for the detection of human pathogens from clinical samples. However, one of the major obstacles to the use of NGS in diagnostic microbiology is the low ratio of pathogen DNA to human DNA in most clinical specimens. In this study, we aimed to develop a specimen-processing protocol to remove human DNA and enrich specimens for bacterial and viral DNA for shotgun metagenomic sequencing. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and nasopharyngeal aspirate (NPA) specimens, spiked with control bacterial and viral pathogens, were processed using either a commercially available kit (MolYsis) or various detergents followed by DNase prior to the extraction of DNA. Relative quantities of human DNA and pathogen DNA were determined by real-time PCR. The MolYsis kit did not improve the pathogen-to-human DNA ratio, but significant reductions (>95%;P< 0.001) in human DNA with minimal effect on pathogen DNA were achieved in samples that were treated with 0.025% saponin, a nonionic surfactant. Specimen preprocessing significantly decreased NGS reads mapped to the human genome (P< 0.05) and improved the sensitivity of pathogen detection (P< 0.01), with a 20- to 650-fold increase in the ratio of microbial reads to human reads. Preprocessing also permitted the detection of pathogens that were undetectable in the unprocessed samples. Our results demonstrate a simple method for the reduction of background human DNA for metagenomic detection for a broad range of pathogens in clinical samples.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal FluidCommunicable DiseasesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNasopharynxReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID26763966
PMCPMC4809942
OpenAlexW2234586290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.