Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763894›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

NOBLE - Flexible concept recognition for large-scale biomedical natural language processing.

Eugene Tseytlin, Kevin Mitchell, Elizabeth Legowski, Julia Corrigan, Girish Chavan, Rebecca S Jacobson

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Formal representation of patients' care context data: the path to improving the electronic health record.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Extracting Smoking Status from Electronic Health Records Using NLP and Deep Learning.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  13. Building Cancer Diagnosis Text to OncoTree Mapping Pipelines for Clinical Sequencing Data Integration and Curation.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Novel phenotype-disease matching tool for rare genetic diseases.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eugene TseytlinDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. eugene.tseytlin@gmail.com.
Kevin MitchellDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. mitchellkj@upmc.edu.
Elizabeth LegowskiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. legowski@bsc.gwu.edu.
Julia CorriganDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. juc61@pitt.edu.
Girish ChavanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. chavang@upmc.edu.
Rebecca S JacobsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, The Offices at Baum, 5607 Baum Boulevard, BAUM 423, Rm 523, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206-3701, USA. rebeccaj@pitt.edu.

Funding

Advanced Development of TIES-Enhancing Access to Tissue for Cancer ResearchU24CA180921 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BECICH, MICHAEL JOHN · 2013 to 2017
$3.3M
Continued Development and Evaluation of caTIESR01CA132672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JACOBSON, REBECCA S · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA132672NCI NIH HHS U24 CA180921
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural language processing (NLP) applications are increasingly important in biomedical data analysis, knowledge engineering, and decision support. Concept recognition is an important component task for NLP pipelines, and can be either general-purpose or domain-specific. We describe a novel, flexible, and general-purpose concept recognition component for NLP pipelines, and compare its speed and accuracy against five commonly used alternatives on both a biological and clinical corpus. NOBLE Coder implements a general algorithm for matching terms to concepts from an arbitrary vocabulary set. The system's matching options can be configured individually or in combination to yield specific system behavior for a variety of NLP tasks. The software is open source, freely available, and easily integrated into UIMA or GATE. We benchmarked speed and accuracy of the system against the CRAFT and ShARe corpora as reference standards and compared it to MMTx, MGrep, Concept Mapper, cTAKES Dictionary Lookup Annotator, and cTAKES Fast Dictionary Lookup Annotator.

resultsWe describe key advantages of the NOBLE Coder system and associated tools, including its greedy algorithm, configurable matching strategies, and multiple terminology input formats. These features provide unique functionality when compared with existing alternatives, including state-of-the-art systems. On two benchmarking tasks, NOBLE's performance exceeded commonly used alternatives, performing almost as well as the most advanced systems. Error analysis revealed differences in error profiles among systems.

conclusionNOBLE Coder is comparable to other widely used concept recognition systems in terms of accuracy and speed. Advantages of NOBLE Coder include its interactive terminology builder tool, ease of configuration, and adaptability to various domains and tasks. NOBLE provides a term-to-concept matching system suitable for general concept recognition in biomedical NLP pipelines.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingSoftwareAlgorithmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID26763894
PMCPMC4712516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.