ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016
The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeted allele frequency tuning in breeding populations via alternative optimum contribution selection.Genetics · 2026Article
- A Similarity Matrix for Preserving Haplotype Diversity Amongst Parents in Genomic Selection.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025Article
- A Novel Conservation Genomic Strategy: Selection for the Probability of Offspring Heterozygosity.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Maintenance of genetic diversity in subdivided populations using genomic coancestry matrices.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Characterizing local pig breeds as reservoirs for the domestic pig genetic variability worldwide via contributions to gene diversity and allelic richness.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Article
- Progress in Genomic Mating in Domestic Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- How to achieve a higher selection plateau in forest tree breeding? Fostering heterozygote × homozygote relationships in optimal contribution selection in the case study ofEvolutionary applications · 2021Article
- The value of genomic relationship matrices to estimate levels of inbreeding.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2021Article
- Article
- Management of Genetic Diversity in the Era of Genomics.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Controlling Coancestry and Thereby Future Inbreeding by Optimum-Contribution Selection Using Alternative Genomic-Relationship Matrices.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- The impact of genomic selection on genetic diversity and genetic gain in three French dairy cattle breeds.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2019Article
- Key Genetic Parameters for Population Management.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Trends in genome-wide and region-specific genetic diversity in the Dutch-Flemish Holstein-Friesian breeding program from 1986 to 2015.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2018Article
- Article
- Novel optimum contribution selection methods accounting for conflicting objectives in breeding programs for livestock breeds with historical migration.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2017Article
- Characterization and management of long runs of homozygosity in parental nucleus lines and their associated crossbred progeny.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOptimal contribution methods have proved to be very efficient for controlling the rates at which coancestry and inbreeding increase and therefore, for maintaining genetic diversity. These methods have usually relied on pedigree information for estimating genetic relationships between animals. However, with the large amount of genomic information now available such as high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips that contain thousands of SNPs, it becomes possible to calculate more accurate estimates of relationships and to target specific regions in the genome where there is a particular interest in maximising genetic diversity. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using genomic coancestry matrices for: (1) minimising the loss of genetic variability at specific genomic regions while restricting the overall loss in the rest of the genome; or (2) maximising the overall genetic diversity while restricting the loss of diversity at specific genomic regions.
resultsOur study shows that the use of genomic coancestry was very successful at minimising the loss of diversity and outperformed the use of pedigree-based coancestry (genetic diversity even increased in some scenarios). The results also show that genomic information allows a targeted optimisation to maintain diversity at specific genomic regions, whether they are linked or not. The level of variability maintained increased when the targeted regions were closely linked. However, such targeted management leads to an important loss of diversity in the rest of the genome and, thus, it is necessary to take further actions to constrain this loss. Optimal contribution methods also proved to be effective at restricting the loss of diversity in the rest of the genome, although the resulting rate of coancestry was higher than the constraint imposed.
conclusionsThe use of genomic matrices when optimising contributions permits the control of genetic diversity and inbreeding at specific regions of the genome through the minimisation of partial genomic coancestry matrices. The formula used to predict coancestry in the next generation produces biased results and therefore it is necessary to refine the theory of genetic contributions when genomic matrices are used to optimise contributions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.