Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763889›Full record

ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2016

The use of genomic coancestry matrices in the optimisation of contributions to maintain genetic diversity at specific regions of the genome.

Fernando Gómez-Romano, Beatriz Villanueva, Jesús Fernández, John A Woolliams, Ricardo Pong-Wong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Similarity Matrix for Preserving Haplotype Diversity Amongst Parents in Genomic Selection.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Progress in Genomic Mating in Domestic Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fernando Gómez-RomanoDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz VillanuevaDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain.
Jesús FernándezDepartamento de Mejora Genética Animal, INIA, Madrid, Spain. jmj@inia.es.
John A WoolliamsThe Roslin Institute and the R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Ricardo Pong-WongThe Roslin Institute and the R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOptimal contribution methods have proved to be very efficient for controlling the rates at which coancestry and inbreeding increase and therefore, for maintaining genetic diversity. These methods have usually relied on pedigree information for estimating genetic relationships between animals. However, with the large amount of genomic information now available such as high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) chips that contain thousands of SNPs, it becomes possible to calculate more accurate estimates of relationships and to target specific regions in the genome where there is a particular interest in maximising genetic diversity. The objective of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of using genomic coancestry matrices for: (1) minimising the loss of genetic variability at specific genomic regions while restricting the overall loss in the rest of the genome; or (2) maximising the overall genetic diversity while restricting the loss of diversity at specific genomic regions.

resultsOur study shows that the use of genomic coancestry was very successful at minimising the loss of diversity and outperformed the use of pedigree-based coancestry (genetic diversity even increased in some scenarios). The results also show that genomic information allows a targeted optimisation to maintain diversity at specific genomic regions, whether they are linked or not. The level of variability maintained increased when the targeted regions were closely linked. However, such targeted management leads to an important loss of diversity in the rest of the genome and, thus, it is necessary to take further actions to constrain this loss. Optimal contribution methods also proved to be effective at restricting the loss of diversity in the rest of the genome, although the resulting rate of coancestry was higher than the constraint imposed.

conclusionsThe use of genomic matrices when optimising contributions permits the control of genetic diversity and inbreeding at specific regions of the genome through the minimisation of partial genomic coancestry matrices. The formula used to predict coancestry in the next generation produces biased results and therefore it is necessary to refine the theory of genetic contributions when genomic matrices are used to optimise contributions.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomeModels, GeneticPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAnimal HusbandryAnimalsComputer SimulationGenetics, PopulationGenomicsGenotypeInbreeding

Identifiers

PMID26763889
PMCPMC5518098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.