Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763790›Full record

Trial reportEuropean heart journal2016

Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions.

Sara Gaur, Kristian Altern Øvrehus, Damini Dey, Jonathon Leipsic, Hans Erik Bøtker, Jesper Møller Jensen, Jagat Narula, Amir Ahmadi, Stephan Achenbach, Brian S Ko and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in European heart journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04547231 (Impact of Stenosis and Plaque Features in Coronary CT Angiography, Physiologic Assessment and Pharmacotherapy on the Clinical Outcomes After Invasive Coronary Angiography), which is not on this map. Cited by 147 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
39.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04547231 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Stenosis and Plaque Features in Coronary CT Angiography, Physiologic Assessment and Pharmacotherapy on the Clinical Outcomes After Invasive Coronary Angiography

TypeobservationalSponsorSeoul National University HospitalRan2020 to 2025Enrolled992ConditionsCoronary Artery DiseaseArmsFractional flow reserve, Coronary CT angiography
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 285 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Predicting Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Using CCTA-Based Radiomics Machine Learning Nomogram.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Sara GaurDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark saga@clin.au.dk.
Kristian Altern ØvrehusDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Damini DeyDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jonathon LeipsicDepartment of Radiology, Division of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Hans Erik BøtkerDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jesper Møller JensenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jagat NarulaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Amir AhmadiDepartment of Radiology, Division of Cardiology, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Stephan AchenbachDepartment of Cardiology, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Brian S KoMonash Cardiovascular Research Centre, Monash University and Monash Heart, Clayton, Australia.
Evald Høj ChristiansenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Anne Kjer KaltoftDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Daniel S BermanDepartment of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Hiram BezerraDepartment of Cardiology, Harrington Heart and Vascular Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Jens Flensted LassenDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Bjarne Linde NørgaardDepartment of Cardiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Aarhus University Hospital · DKCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USSt. Paul's Hospital · CAFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMonash University · AUUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsCoronary plaque characteristics are associated with ischaemia. Differences in plaque volumes and composition may explain the discordance between coronary stenosis severity and ischaemia. We evaluated the association between coronary stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT), and lesion-specific ischaemia identified by FFR in a substudy of the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). METHODS AND

resultsCoronary CTA stenosis, plaque volumes, FFRCT, and FFR were assessed in 484 vessels from 254 patients. Stenosis >50% was considered obstructive. Plaque volumes (non-calcified plaque [NCP], low-density NCP [LD-NCP], and calcified plaque [CP]) were quantified using semi-automated software. Optimal thresholds of quantitative plaque variables were defined by area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve (AUC) analysis. Ischaemia was defined by FFR or FFRCT ≤0.80. Plaque volumes were inversely related to FFR irrespective of stenosis severity. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) for prediction of ischaemia for stenosis >50%, NCP ≥185 mm(3), LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3), CP ≥9 mm(3), and FFRCT ≤0.80 were 5.0 (3.0-8.3), 3.7 (2.4-5.6), 4.6 (2.9-7.4), 1.4 (1.0-2.0), and 13.6 (8.4-21.9), respectively. Low-density NCP predicted ischaemia independent of other plaque characteristics. Low-density NCP and FFRCT yielded diagnostic improvement over stenosis assessment with AUCs increasing from 0.71 by stenosis >50% to 0.79 and 0.90 when adding LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3) and LD-NCP ≥30 mm(3) + FFRCT ≤0.80, respectively.

conclusionStenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and FFRCT predict lesion-specific ischaemia. Plaque assessment and FFRCT provide improved discrimination of ischaemia compared with stenosis assessment alone.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary StenosisFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPlaque, AtheroscleroticVentricular RemodelingComputational fluid dynamicsComputed tomography angiographyCoronary plaqueFractional flow reserveIschaemia

Identifiers

PMID26763790
PMCPMC4830909
OpenAlexW2271658865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.