Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763698›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Moa diet fits the bill: virtual reconstruction incorporating mummified remains and prediction of biomechanical performance in avian giants.

Marie R G Attard, Laura A B Wilson, Trevor H Worthy, Paul Scofield, Peter Johnston, William C H Parr, Stephen Wroe

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New Zealand's extinct giant raptor (Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Evolutionary biomechanics: hard tissues and soft evidence?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Head to head: the case for fighting behaviour inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Coprolites reveal ecological interactions lost with the extinction of New Zealand birds.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Marie R G AttardSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Laboratory, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia mattard3@une.edu.au.
Laura A B WilsonSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales 2052, Australia.
Trevor H WorthySchool of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia.
Paul ScofieldCanterbury Museum, Rolleston Avenue, Christchurch 8013, New Zealand.
Peter JohnstonDepartment of Anatomy, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
William C H ParrSurgical and Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales 2031, Australia.
Stephen WroeSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, Function, Evolution and Anatomy Research Laboratory, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUCanterbury Museum · NZFlinders University · AUSydney Orthopaedic Research Institute · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of New England · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The moa (Dinornithiformes) are large to gigantic extinct terrestrial birds of New Zealand. Knowledge about niche partitioning, feeding mode and preference among moa species is limited, hampering palaeoecological reconstruction and evaluation of the impacts of their extinction on remnant native biota, or the viability of exotic species as proposed ecological 'surrogates'. Here we apply three-dimensional finite-element analysis to compare the biomechanical performance of skulls from five of the six moa genera, and two extant ratites, to predict the range of moa feeding behaviours relative to each other and to living relatives. Mechanical performance during biting was compared using simulations of the birds clipping twigs based on muscle reconstruction of mummified moa remains. Other simulated food acquisition strategies included lateral shaking, pullback and dorsoventral movement of the skull. We found evidence for limited overlap in biomechanical performance between the extant emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) and extinct upland moa (Megalapteryx didinus) based on similarities in mandibular stress distribution in two loading cases, but overall our findings suggest that moa species exploited their habitats in different ways, relative to both each other and extant ratites. The broad range of feeding strategies used by moa, as inferred from interspecific differences in biomechanical performance of the skull, provides insight into mechanisms that facilitated high diversities of these avian herbivores in prehistoric New Zealand.

Indexed as

HerbivoryAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBirdsExtinction, BiologicalFossilsImaging, Three-DimensionalNew ZealandSkullSpecies Specificitybiomechanicsdinornithiformesfinite-element analysismoaratite

Identifiers

PMID26763698
PMCPMC4721086
OpenAlexW2260921561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.