Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763694›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Replicated divergence in cichlid radiations mirrors a major vertebrate innovation.

Matthew D McGee, Brant C Faircloth, Samuel R Borstein, Jimmy Zheng, C Darrin Hulsey, Peter C Wainwright, Michael E Alfaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cranial modularity drives phenotypic diversification and adaptive radiation of Antarctic icefishes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Biomechanical Specialization Acts as an Asymmetrical Constraint on the Phenotype.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew D McGeeDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA mcgee.matthew@gmail.com.
Brant C FairclothDepartment of Biological Sciences and Museum of Natural Science, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA brant@faircloth-lab.org.
Samuel R BorsteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Jimmy ZhengDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
C Darrin HulseyDepartment of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Peter C WainwrightDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Michael E AlfaroDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA michaelalfero@ucla.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decoupling of the upper jaw bones--jaw kinesis--is a distinctive feature of the ray-finned fishes, but it is not clear how the innovation is related to the extraordinary diversity of feeding behaviours and feeding ecology in this group. We address this issue in a lineage of ray-finned fishes that is well known for its ecological and functional diversity--African rift lake cichlids. We sequenced ultraconserved elements to generate a phylogenomic tree of the Lake Tanganyika and Lake Malawi cichlid radiations. We filmed a diverse array of over 50 cichlid species capturing live prey and quantified the extent of jaw kinesis in the premaxillary and maxillary bones. Our combination of phylogenomic and kinematic data reveals a strong association between biting modes of feeding and reduced jaw kinesis, suggesting that the contrasting demands of biting and suction feeding have strongly influenced cranial evolution in both cichlid radiations.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionFeeding BehaviorAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCichlidsJawPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNAevolutionary innovationkinematicsultraconserved elements

Identifiers

PMID26763694
PMCPMC4721080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.