Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763652›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2016

What Determines HIV Prevention Costs at Scale? Evidence from the Avahan Programme in India.

Aurélia Lépine, Sudhashree Chandrashekar, Govindraj Shetty, Peter Vickerman, Janet Bradley, Michel Alary, Stephen Moses, CHARME India Group, Anna Vassall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Estimators Used in Multisite Healthcare Costing Studies in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Simulation Study.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aurélia LépineLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sudhashree ChandrashekarLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Govindraj ShettyKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bangalore, India.
Peter VickermanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Janet BradleyURESP, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Michel AlaryURESP, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec, Québec, Canada.
Stephen MosesKarnataka Health Promotion Trust, Bangalore, India.
CHARME India Group
Anna VassallLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L012057/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanding essential health services through non-government organisations (NGOs) is a central strategy for achieving universal health coverage in many low-income and middle-income countries. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention services for key populations are commonly delivered through NGOs and have been demonstrated to be cost-effective and of substantial global public health importance. However, funding for HIV prevention remains scarce, and there are growing calls internationally to improve the efficiency of HIV prevention programmes as a key strategy to reach global HIV targets. To date, there is limited evidence on the determinants of costs of HIV prevention delivered through NGOs; and thus, policymakers have little guidance in how best to design programmes that are both effective and efficient. We collected economic costs from the Indian Avahan initiative, the largest HIV prevention project conducted globally, during the first 4 years of its implementation. We use a fixed-effect panel estimator and a random-intercept model to investigate the determinants of average cost. We find that programme design choices such as NGO scale, the extent of community involvement, the way in which support is offered to NGOs and how clinical services are organised substantially impact average cost in a grant-based payment setting.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleFinancial SupportHealth PromotionHealth Services ResearchHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMaleModels, EconomicProgram EvaluationAvahanaverage costHIV preventionIndiaNGOscale-up

Identifiers

PMID26763652
PMCPMC5019264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.