Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763626›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2016

Development of new host-specific Bacteroides qPCRs for the identification of fecal contamination sources in water.

Marta Gómez-Doñate, Arnau Casanovas-Massana, Maite Muniesa, Anicet R Blanch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. ExploringmicroLife · 2026
    Article
  2. Host-AssociatedMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Markers Specific toInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta Gómez-DoñateDepartment of Microbiology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain.
Arnau Casanovas-MassanaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain.
Maite MuniesaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain.
Anicet R BlanchDepartment of Microbiology, University of Barcelona, Diagonal 643, Barcelona, Catalonia, 08028, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteroides spp. have been proposed as indicators of fecal contamination in microbial source tracking (MST) methodologies. The aim of this study was to develop new qPCR assays that target host-specific Bacteroidal 16S ribosomal RNA genes, to determine the source of fecal contamination in water. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was used to select for host-specific bands of Bacteroides associated with a fecal pollution source and later to design four qPCR host-specific assays. A set of common primers for Bacteroides spp., four different Bacteroides spp. host-associated hydrolysis probes (human, cattle, pig, and poultry), and one hydrolysis probe for the Bacteroides genus were designed. This set of qPCR assays together with other previously developed Bacteroidetes MST targets were used to analyze water samples with fecal contamination from the four sources studied. The host-specific Bacteroides qPCRs designed for human (HMprobeBac), pig (PGprobeBac), and poultry (PLprobeBac) were highly specific for its sources (1.0, 0.97, and 1.0, respectively) although its sensitivity was lower (0.45, 0.50, and 0.73, respectively). The cattle-specific qPCR was totally unspecific and was discarded for future experiments. When compared to previously designed assays, the human and pig qPCRs showed better accuracies (0.86 and 0.84) than their counterparts HF183 and Pig-2-Bac (0.38 and 0.65). Thus, the newly designed human, pig, and poultry qPCR assays outperform other methods developed until date and may be useful for source tracking purposes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacteroidesCattleChickensColiphagesDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisDNA, BacterialEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coliFecesHumansReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence AlignmentSwineWastewaterDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWastewaterBacteroidesDGGEmicrobial source trackingquantitative PCR

Identifiers

PMID26763626
PMCPMC4767429
OpenAlexW2236929306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.