Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26763411›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2016

Prospective evaluation of radiation-induced skin toxicity in a race/ethnically diverse breast cancer population.

Jean L Wright, Cristiane Takita, Isildinha M Reis, Wei Zhao, Eunkyung Lee, Omar L Nelson, Jennifer J Hu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Proton reirradiation for recurrent or new primary breast cancer in the setting of prior breast irradiation.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jean L WrightDepartment of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cristiane TakitaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Isildinha M ReisDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Wei ZhaoSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Eunkyung LeeDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Omar L NelsonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Jennifer J HuDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
University of Miami · USUniversity of Miami Health System · USJohns Hopkins University · USSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Impact of Genomics on Disparities in Breast Cancer RadiosensitivityR01CA135288 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HU, JENNIFER J · 2010 to 2014
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA135288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated predictors of radiation-induced skin toxicity in a prospective study of a tri-racial/ethnic breast cancer population. We evaluated patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment variables in the first 392 patients in a prospective study assessing radiation-induced skin toxicity. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate potential predictors of skin toxicity. The study consists of 59 non-Hispanic whites (NHW; 15%), 241 Hispanic Whites (HW; 62%), 79 black or African Americans (AA; 20%), and 13 others (3%). Overall, 48% developed grade 0-1 skin toxicity, 49.8% grade 2, and 2.2% grade 3 by the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) scale. Twenty-one percent developed moist desquamation. In multivariate analysis, higher body mass index (BMI; OR = 2.09; 95%CI = 1.15, 3.82), higher disease stage (OR = 1.82; 95%CI = 1.06, 3.11), ER-positive/PR-negative status (OR = 2.74; 95%CI = 1.26, 5.98), and conventionally fractionated regimens (OR = 3.25; 95%CI = 1.76, 6.01) were significantly associated with higher skin toxicity grade after adjustment for age, race, ethnicity, ER status, and breast volume. B MI specifically predicted for moist desquamation, but not degree of erythema. In this racially and ethnically diverse cohort of breast cancer patients receiving radiation to the intact breast, risk factors including BMI, disease stage, and conventionally fractionated radiation predicted for higher skin toxicity grade, whereas age, race, ethnicity, and breast volume did not. BMI specifically predicted for moist desquamation, suggesting that preventive measures to address this particular outcome should be investigated.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiodermatitisRisk FactorsWhite PeopleBreast cancerracial/ethnic disparityradiation dermatitisradiation therapyskin toxicity

Identifiers

PMID26763411
PMCPMC4799959
OpenAlexW2236710187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.