Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762981›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2016

The role of MatP, ZapA and ZapB in chromosomal organization and dynamics in Escherichia coli.

Jaana Männik, Daniel E Castillo, Da Yang, George Siopsis, Jaan Männik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The role of active mRNA-ribosome dynamics and closing constriction in daughter chromosome separation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biophysical journal · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Evidence for Involvement of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jaana MännikDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0840, USA.
Daniel E CastilloDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1200, USA.
Da YangDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1200, USA.
George SiopsisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1200, USA.
Jaan MännikDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-0840, USA Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1200, USA JMannik@utk.edu.
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research over several decades, a comprehensive view of how the Escherichia coli chromosome is organized within the nucleoid, and how two daughter chromosomes segregate has yet to emerge. Here we investigate the role of the MatP, ZapA and ZapB proteins in organizing the replication terminus (Ter) region and in the chromosomal segregation process. Quantitative image analysis of the fluorescently labeled Ter region shows that the replication terminus attaches to the divisome in a single segment along the perimeter of the cell in a MatP, ZapA and ZapB-dependent manner. The attachment does not significantly affect the bulk chromosome segregation in slow growth conditions. With or without the attachment, two chromosomal masses separate from each other at a speed comparable to the cell growth. The separation starts even before the replication terminus region positions itself at the center of the nucleoid. Modeling of the segregation based on conformational entropy correctly predicts the positioning of the replication terminus region within the nucleoid. However, the model produces a distinctly different chromosomal density distribution than the experiment, indicating that the conformational entropy plays a limited role in segregating the chromosomes in the late stages of replication.

Indexed as

Carrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsCell DivisionChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosomes, BacterialDNA, BacterialDNA ReplicationEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceModels, GeneticMolecular Dynamics SimulationReplication OriginCarrier ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneDNA, BacterialEscherichia coli ProteinsLuminescent ProteinsMatP protein, E coliZapA protein, E coliZapB protein, E coli

Identifiers

PMID26762981
PMCPMC4756834
OpenAlexW2233806488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.