Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762723›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of cardiology2016

Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography Findings to Modify Statin and Aspirin Prescription in Patients With Acute Chest Pain.

Amit Pursnani, Csilla Celeng, Christopher L Schlett, Thomas Mayrhofer, Pearl Zakroysky, Hang Lee, Maros Ferencik, Jerome L Fleg, Fabian Bamberg, Stephen D Wiviott and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Amit PursnaniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: amit.pursnani@gmail.com.
Csilla CelengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christopher L SchlettDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thomas MayrhoferDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pearl ZakroyskyMassachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Hang LeeMassachusetts General Hospital Biostatistics Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Maros FerencikDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jerome L FlegDivision of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Fabian BambergDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Klinikum Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Stephen D WiviottCardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Quynh A TruongDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
James E UdelsonDivision of Cardiology and the Cardiovascular Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
John T NagurneyDivision of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Udo HoffmannDivision of Cardiology, Department of Radiology, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, Positron Emission Tomography, and Computed Tomography Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Harvard University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHeidelberg University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USTufts Medical Center · US

Funding

ROMICAT II - CCC - Lead ApplicationU01HL092040 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2009 to 2013
$4.9M
Cardiac MR and CT ResearchT32HL076136 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NEILAN, TOMAS G · 2004 to 2019
$4.9M
Rule-Out Myocardial Infarction Using Computed Assisted Tomography-ROMICATII,DCCU01HL092022 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI SCHOENFELD, DAVID ALAN · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
Cardiovascular Imaging in Ischemic Heart DiseaseK24HL113128 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2012 to 2020
$1.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5K24HL113128NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL113128NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076136NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL092022NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL092022NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL092040NHLBI NIH HHS U01HL092040
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is used in patients with low-intermediate chest pain presenting to the emergency department for its reliability in excluding acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, its influence on medication modification in this setting is unclear. We sought to determine whether knowledge of CCTA-based coronary artery disease (CAD) was associated with change in statin and aspirin prescription. We used the CCTA arm of the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computed Angiographic Tomography II multicenter, randomized control trial (R-II) and comparison cohort from the observational Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computed Angiographic Tomography I cohort (R-I). In R-II, subjects were randomly assigned to CCTA to guide decision making, whereas in R-I patients underwent CCTA with results blinded to caregivers and managed according to standard care. Our final cohort consisted of 277 subjects from R-I and 370 from R-II. ACS rate was similar (6.9% vs 6.2% respectively, p = 0.75). For subjects with CCTA-detected obstructive CAD without ACS, initiation of statin was significantly greater after disclosure of CCTA results (0% in R-I vs 20% in R-II, p = 0.009). Conversely, for subjects without CCTA-detected CAD, aspirin prescription was lower with disclosure of CCTA results (16% in R-I vs 4.8% in R-II, p = 0.001). However, only 68% of subjects in R-II with obstructive CAD were discharged on statin and 65% on aspirin. In conclusion, physician knowledge of CCTA results leads to improved alignment of aspirin and statin with the presence and severity of CAD although still many patients with CCTA-detected CAD are not discharged on aspirin or statin. Our findings suggest opportunity for practice improvement when CCTA is performed in the emergency department.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeAdultAgedAspirinChest PainCoronary AngiographyDecision MakingDiagnosis, DifferentialDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug PrescriptionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedAspirinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26762723
PMCPMC5931331
OpenAlexW2199211793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.