Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762643›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Predicting condom use in adolescents: a test of three socio-cognitive models using a structural equation modeling approach.

José P Espada, Alexandra Morales, Alejandro Guillén-Riquelme, Rafael Ballester, Mireia Orgilés

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Theory-based interventions for contraception.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  3. Sexual Communication and Sexual Consent Self-Efficacy Among College Students: Implications for Sexually Transmitted Infection Prevention.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. "Who Are at Higher Sexual Risk?" Latent Class Analysis of Behavioral Intentions among Spanish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Psychometric Properties of the Colombian Version of the HIV Attitudes Scale for Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José P EspadaDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Av. de la Universidad, s/n, 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain. jpespada@umh.es.
Alexandra MoralesDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Av. de la Universidad, s/n, 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain. alexandra.moraless@umh.es.
Alejandro Guillén-RiquelmeDepartment of Personality, Evaluation and Psychological Treatment, University of Granada, Campus Universitario de Cartuja, 18011, Granada, Spain. aguillenriquelme@ugr.es.
Rafael BallesterDepartment of Basic and Clinical Psychology and Psychobiology, Jaume I University of Castellón, Avda. Sos Baynat, s/n, 12071 Castellón de la Plana, Castellón, Spain. rballest@psb.uji.es.
Mireia OrgilésDepartment of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University, Av. de la Universidad, s/n, 03202, Elche, Alicante, Spain. morgiles@umh.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe theory of planned behavior (TPB), socio-cognitive model (SCM), and information-motivation-behavioral skills (IMB) model are effective in predicting condom use. However, the adequacy of these three theoretical models in predicting the frequency of condom use (FCU) among young people has not been compared. This cross-sectional study tested the applicability and suitability of these three models in predicting the FCU, and analyzed the relationships among the postulated constructs.

methodsSexually experienced adolescents (n = 410) aged 13-18 completed a survey assessing the TPB, SCM, and IMB model constructs. Participants were students recruited from 18 high schools, randomly selected from the north, south, east, and southeast of Spain. A structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis was applied to test TPB, SCM and IBM and constructs relationships of each model using R.

resultsThe results of SEM demonstrated that behavioral skills predict behavior via motivation as hypothesized by the IMB model, but not directly via knowledge about condom use and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Cognitive factors, such knowledge about condom use and STIs as well as condom use self-efficacy, directly predicted the FCU when modeled as per the SCM. According to the TPB, condom use intention was the best predictor of the FCU, and condom use intention was predicted by attitudes toward condom use and subjective norms related to condom use, but perceived control was not directly or indirectly related to the FCU. Based on the data, the TPB becomes the best-fit model for predicting the FCU among young people compared to the SCM and IMB model.

conclusionsFrom a statistical perspective, the TPB seems to be the most suitable model for predicting the FCU among young people compared to the other models. Overall, key direct predictors of the FCU in adolescents included condom use intention, behavioral skills and cognitive factors, such as STIs knowledge and condom use self-efficacy. The next step should be to test integrative models that include personal, contextual, environmental, and social factors.

Indexed as

AttitudeCognitionIntentionModels, PsychologicalAdolescentCondomsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalMotivationSafe SexSchoolsSelf EfficacySexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID26762643
PMCPMC4712548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.