ArticleJournal of vision2016
Ocular-following responses to white noise stimuli in humans reveal a novel nonlinearity that results from temporal sampling.
Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ocular-following responses to broadband visual stimuli of varying motion coherence.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Weighted power summation and contrast normalization mechanisms account for short-latency eye movements to motion and disparity of sine-wave gratings and broadband visual stimuli in humans.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Manipulating the Fourier spectra of stimuli comprising a two-frame kinematogram to study early visual motion-detecting mechanisms: Perception versus short latency ocular-following responses.Journal of vision · 2023Article
- Article
- Weighted summation and contrast normalization account for short-latency disparity vergence responses to white noise stimuli in humans.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Ocular-following responses in school-age children.PloS one · 2022Article
- Short-latency ocular following responses to motion stimuli are strongly affected by temporal modulations of the visual content during the initial fixation period.Journal of vision · 2021Article
- Short-latency ocular-following responses: Weighted nonlinear summation predicts the outcome of a competition between two sine wave gratings moving in opposite directions.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Suppression and Contrast Normalization in Motion Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Human short-latency ocular vergence responses produced by interocular velocity differences.Journal of vision · 2016Article
- Speed Estimation for Visual Tracking Emerges Dynamically from Nonlinear Frequency Interactions.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
White noise stimuli are frequently used to study the visual processing of broadband images in the laboratory. A common goal is to describe how responses are derived from Fourier components in the image. We investigated this issue by recording the ocular-following responses (OFRs) to white noise stimuli in human subjects. For a given speed we compared OFRs to unfiltered white noise with those to noise filtered with band-pass filters and notch filters. Removing components with low spatial frequency (SF) reduced OFR magnitudes, and the SF associated with the greatest reduction matched the SF that produced the maximal response when presented alone. This reduction declined rapidly with SF, compatible with a winner-take-all operation. Removing higher SF components increased OFR magnitudes. For higher speeds this effect became larger and propagated toward lower SFs. All of these effects were quantitatively well described by a model that combined two factors: (a) an excitatory drive that reflected the OFRs to individual Fourier components and (b) a suppression by higher SF channels where the temporal sampling of the display led to flicker. This nonlinear interaction has an important practical implication: Even with high refresh rates (150 Hz), the temporal sampling introduced by visual displays has a significant impact on visual processing. For instance, we show that this distorts speed tuning curves, shifting the peak to lower speeds. Careful attention to spectral content, in the light of this nonlinearity, is necessary to minimize the resulting artifact when using white noise patterns undergoing apparent motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.