Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762152›Full record

SynthesisReproductive health2016

Tocolysis for inhibiting preterm birth in extremely preterm birth, multiple gestations and in growth-restricted fetuses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Celine Miyazaki, Ralf Moreno Garcia, Ralfh Garcia Moreno, Erika Ota, Toshiyuki Swa, Olufemi T Oladapo, Rintaro Mori

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Celine MiyazakiDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. celine-m@ncchd.go.jp.
Ralf Moreno GarciaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. ralfmorenog@gmail.com.
Ralfh Garcia Moreno
Erika OtaDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. ota-e@ncchd.go.jp.
Toshiyuki SwaGraduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan. mktb@tcct.zaq.ne.jp.
Olufemi T OladapoDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. oladapoo@who.int.
Rintaro MoriDepartment of Health Policy, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan. mori-r@ncchd.go.jp.
National Center For Child Health and Development · JPOsaka University of Human Sciences · JPWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review was to identify available evidence on the effectiveness of tocolysis in inhibiting preterm delivery for women with threatened extremely preterm birth, multiple gestations, and growth-restricted babies, and their infants' outcomes. A comprehensive search using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, POPLINE and the WHO Global Health Library databases was conducted on 14 February 2014. For selection criteria, randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies that compared tocolysis treatment to placebo or no treatment were considered. Selection of eligible studies, critical appraisal of the included studies, data collection, meta-analyses, and assessment of evidence quality were performed in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration's guidance and validated assessment criteria. The search identified seven studies for extremely preterm birth, in which three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and four were non-randomized studies (non-RCTs). There were no eligible studies identified for women with multiple pregnancy and growth-restricted fetuses. Meta-analyses indicated no significant difference was found for the relative effectiveness of tocolytics versus placebo for prolonging pregnancy in women with extremely preterm birth (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.31) or reducing the rate of perinatal deaths (RR 2.22, 95% CI 0.26 to 19.24). In summary, there is no evidence to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of tocolytic therapy for women with threatened extremely preterm birth, multiple gestations, and growth-restricted babies.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based MedicinePregnancy, MultipleAdultFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansInfant, Extremely Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMaleNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicObstetric Labor, PrematurePractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyPremature BirthRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTocolysis

Identifiers

PMID26762152
PMCPMC4712490
OpenAlexW2236785546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.