ReviewInsights into imaging2016
Use of cryoablation beyond the prostate.
Review in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast Cancer Cryoablation in the Multidisciplinary Setting: Practical Guidelines for Patients and Physicians.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Percutaneous cryoablation of follicular thyroid carcinoma metastasis to the pancreasDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023Article
- Recent progress in cryoablation cancer therapy and nanoparticles mediated cryoablation.Theranostics · 2022Review
- Commentary: Treatment of prostate cancer.Current urology · 2021Article
- Oxidative Effects during Irreversible Electroporation of Melanoma Cells-In Vitro Study.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Dual-robot ultrasound-guided needle placement: closing the planning-imaging-action loop.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016Article
- Ablative Therapies for Breast Cancer: State of Art.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledCryoablation has been used for many years as a surgical ablation technique in the prostate and kidney. However, since the introduction of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and robotic surgery for prostate tumours, its popularity in the urologic community has declined. In the early 2000s, innovations in cryoablation technology allowed the use of thinner probes, which were suitable for percutaneous application. As a result, radiologists began using cryoablation, first in the liver, and then in other organs or tissues such as the kidney, lung, breast, pancreas, bone, and soft tissue. In most of these locations, cryoablation has great potential given its inherent advantages, including the use of local anaesthesia, little or no pain during and after the procedure, real-time monitoring of the ablation area on US, CT or MRI, the potential for ablation of large tumours with multiple probes, and the ability to change the shape of the ablation in non-spherical tumours. Yet despite these advantages, the use of percutaneous cryoablation among radiologists appears to be far lower than that of heat-based ablation techniques. The aim of this article is to outline specific aspects of cryoablation and to illustrate its potential clinical applications with case presentations. KEY POINTS: • Recent advances have made cryoablation suitable for percutaneous use by radiologists with image guidance. • Cryoablation has distinct advantages over heat-based ablation techniques. • Cryoablation is becoming increasingly popular for lung, breast, kidney, bone, and soft tissue tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.