Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762141›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2016

Use of cryoablation beyond the prostate.

Saim Yılmaz, Mustafa Özdoğan, Metin Cevener, Ali Ozluk, Aysegul Kargi, Feride Kendiroglu, Irfan Ogretmen, Akin Yildiz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Percutaneous cryoablation of follicular thyroid carcinoma metastasis to the pancreasDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Dual-robot ultrasound-guided needle placement: closing the planning-imaging-action loop.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2016
    Article
  7. Ablative Therapies for Breast Cancer: State of Art.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Saim YılmazMIIO Group, Radiology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey. saimyilmaz62@gmail.com.
Mustafa ÖzdoğanMIIO Group, Medical Oncology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Metin CevenerMIIO Group, Radiology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Ali OzlukMIIO Group, General Surgery Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Aysegul KargiMIIO Group, Medical Oncology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Feride KendirogluMIIO Group, Radiology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Irfan OgretmenMIIO Group, Medical Oncology Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Akin YildizMIIO Group, Nuclear Medicine Division, Memorial-MedStar Hospitals, Antalya, Turkey.
Antalya IVF · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledCryoablation has been used for many years as a surgical ablation technique in the prostate and kidney. However, since the introduction of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and robotic surgery for prostate tumours, its popularity in the urologic community has declined. In the early 2000s, innovations in cryoablation technology allowed the use of thinner probes, which were suitable for percutaneous application. As a result, radiologists began using cryoablation, first in the liver, and then in other organs or tissues such as the kidney, lung, breast, pancreas, bone, and soft tissue. In most of these locations, cryoablation has great potential given its inherent advantages, including the use of local anaesthesia, little or no pain during and after the procedure, real-time monitoring of the ablation area on US, CT or MRI, the potential for ablation of large tumours with multiple probes, and the ability to change the shape of the ablation in non-spherical tumours. Yet despite these advantages, the use of percutaneous cryoablation among radiologists appears to be far lower than that of heat-based ablation techniques. The aim of this article is to outline specific aspects of cryoablation and to illustrate its potential clinical applications with case presentations. KEY POINTS: • Recent advances have made cryoablation suitable for percutaneous use by radiologists with image guidance. • Cryoablation has distinct advantages over heat-based ablation techniques. • Cryoablation is becoming increasingly popular for lung, breast, kidney, bone, and soft tissue tumours.

Indexed as

Ablation techniquesCryoablationLiver cancerLung cancerRenal cancer

Identifiers

PMID26762141
PMCPMC4805614
OpenAlexW2234710905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.