Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26762125›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Process evaluation of a knowledge translation intervention using facilitation of local stakeholder groups to improve neonatal survival in the Quang Ninh province, Vietnam.

Leif Eriksson, Tran Q Huy, Duong M Duc, Katarina Ekholm Selling, Dinh P Hoa, Nguyen T Thuy, Nguyen T Nga, Lars-Åke Persson, Lars Wallin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leif ErikssonInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. leif.eriksson@kbh.uu.se.
Tran Q HuyNursing office, Department of Medical Services Administration, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. huyub@yahoo.com.
Duong M DucInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. duong_duc2002@yahoo.com.
Katarina Ekholm SellingInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. katarina.selling@kbh.uu.se.
Dinh P HoaHanoi School of Public Health, Hanoi, Vietnam. phuonghoa55@yahoo.com.
Nguyen T ThuyVietnam Sweden Uong Bi General Hospital, Quang Ninh, Vietnam. nguyenthuyubh@gmail.com.
Nguyen T NgaInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. nga.nguyen@kbh.uu.se.
Lars-Åke PerssonInternational Maternal and Child Health, Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. lars-ake.persson@kbh.uu.se.
Lars WallinDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. lars.wallin@du.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnnually, 2.8 million neonatal deaths occur worldwide, despite the fact that three-quarters of them could be prevented if available evidence-based interventions were used. Facilitation of community groups has been recognized as a promising method to translate knowledge into practice. In northern Vietnam, the Neonatal Health - Knowledge Into Practice trial evaluated facilitation of community groups (2008-2011) and succeeded in reducing the neonatal mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 0.51; 95 % confidence interval 0.30-0.89). The aim of this paper is to report on the process (implementation and mechanism of impact) of this intervention.

methodsProcess data were excerpted from diary information from meetings with facilitators and intervention groups, and from supervisor records of monthly meetings with facilitators. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. An evaluation including attributes and skills of facilitators (e.g., group management, communication, and commitment) was performed at the end of the intervention using a six-item instrument. Odds ratios were analyzed, adjusted for cluster randomization using general linear mixed models.

resultsTo ensure eight active facilitators over 3 years, 11 Women's Union representatives were recruited and trained. Of the 44 intervention groups, composed of health staff and commune stakeholders, 43 completed their activities until the end of the study. In total, 95 % (n = 1508) of the intended monthly meetings with an intervention group and a facilitator were conducted. The overall attendance of intervention group members was 86 %. The groups identified 32 unique problems and implemented 39 unique actions. The identified problems targeted health issues concerning both women and neonates. Actions implemented were mainly communication activities. Communes supported by a group with a facilitator who was rated high on attributes and skills (n = 27) had lower odds of neonatal mortality (odds ratio, 0.37; 95 % confidence interval, 0.19-0.73) than control communes (n = 46).

conclusionsThis evaluation identified several factors that might have influenced the outcomes of the trial: continuity of intervention groups' work, adequate attributes and skills of facilitators, and targeting problems along a continuum of care. Such factors are important to consider in scaling-up efforts.

trial registrationISRCTN ISRCTN44599712 .

Indexed as

Infant MortalitySocial FacilitationContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPerinatal CareProgram EvaluationTranslational Research, BiomedicalVietnam

Identifiers

PMID26762125
PMCPMC4711002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.