Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26761805›Full record

ArticleKorean journal for food science of animal resources2015

Screening and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains with Anti-inflammatory Activities through in vitro and Caenorhabditis elegans Model Testing.

Hye Kyoung Lee, Sun-Hae Choi, Cho Rong Lee, Sun Hee Lee, Mi Ri Park, Younghoon Kim, Myung-Ki Lee, Geun-Bae Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Korean journal for food science of animal resources, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Whole-Genome Sequencing of ThreeJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in nutrition · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Foodborne StrainMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hye Kyoung LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 456-756, Korea.
Sun-Hae ChoiDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 456-756, Korea.
Cho Rong LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 456-756, Korea.
Sun Hee LeeDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 456-756, Korea.
Mi Ri ParkBK21 Plus Graduate Program, Department of Animal Science and Institute Agricultural Science & Technology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 561-756, Korea.
Younghoon KimBK21 Plus Graduate Program, Department of Animal Science and Institute Agricultural Science & Technology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 561-756, Korea.
Myung-Ki LeeFermentation and Functionality Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Sungnam 463-746, Korea.
Geun-Bae KimDepartment of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 456-756, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to screen candidate probiotic strains for anti-inflammatory activity. Initially, a nitric oxide (NO) assay was used to test selected candidate probiotic strains for anti-inflammatory activity in cultures of the murine macrophage cell line, RAW 264.7. Then, the in vitro probiotic properties of the strains, including bile tolerance, acid resistance, and growth in skim milk media, were investigated. We also performed an in vitro hydrophobicity test and an intestinal adhesion assay using Caenorhabditis elegans as a surrogate in vivo model. From our screening, we obtained 4 probiotic candidate lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains based on their anti-inflammatory activity in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated RAW 264.7 cell cultures and the results of the in vitro and in vivo probiotic property assessments. Molecular characterization using 16S rDNA sequencing analysis identified the 4 LAB strains as Lactobacillus plantarum. The selected L. plantarum strains (CAU1054, CAU1055, CAU1064, and CAU1106) were found to possess desirable in vitro and in vivo probiotic properties, and these strains are good candidates for further investigations in animal models and human clinical studies to elucidate the mechanisms underlying their anti-inflammatory activities.

Indexed as

anti-inflammatoryCaenorhabditis eleganslactic acid bacteriaprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID26761805
PMCPMC4682497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.