ArticleRadiology2016
Detection of Prostate Cancer: Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed Using Registered Correlative Histopathology.
Article in Radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi-institutional study.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2017Trial
- Correlations Between MR Apparent Diffusion Coefficients and PET Standard Uptake Values in Simultaneous MR-PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Improved quantitative parameter estimation for prostate TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A General Bayesian Functional Spatial Partitioning Method for Multiple Region Discovery Applied to Prostate Cancer MRI.Bayesian analysis · 2024Article
- Precise localization of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma based on three-dimensional histology-MR image fusion: anQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Prostate cancer lesion detection, volume quantification and high-grade cancer differentiation using cancer risk maps derived from multiparametric MRI with histopathology as the reference standard.Magnetic resonance imaging · 2023Article
- Multi-resolution super learner for voxel-wise classification of prostate cancer using multi-parametric MRI.Journal of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Emerging MR methods for improved diagnosis of prostate cancer by multiparametric MRI.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Review
- T2 mapping for the characterization of prostate lesions.World journal of urology · 2022Article
- Response to: Correspondence on 'Novel imaging biomarkers predict outcomes in stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiation and durvalumab' by ZhengJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2022Article
- Bayesian spatial models for voxel-wise prostate cancer classification using multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging data.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Short-duration dynamic [EJNMMI research · 2021Article
- Impact of 18-French Rectal Tube Placement on Image Quality of Multiparametric Prostate MRI.AJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2021Article
- ProsRegNet: A deep learning framework for registration of MRI and histopathology images of the prostate.Medical image analysis · 2021Article
- Algorithms applied to spatially registered multi-parametric MRI for prostate tumor volume measurement.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2021Article
- Training Convolutional Networks for Prostate Segmentation With Limited Data.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021Article
- Clinical utility of combined T2-weighted imaging and T2-mapping in the detection of prostate cancer: a multi-observer study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2020Article
- First in-vivo human imaging at 10.5T: Imaging the body at 447 MHz.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2020Article
- Targeted Biopsy Validation of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer Characterization With Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting and Diffusion Mapping.Investigative radiology · 2019Article
- Recommendations towards standards for quantitative MRI (qMRI) and outstanding needs.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To develop multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging models to generate a quantitative, user-independent, voxel-wise composite biomarker score (CBS) for detection of prostate cancer by using coregistered correlative histopathologic results, and to compare performance of CBS-based detection with that of single quantitative MR imaging parameters. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer underwent multiparametric MR imaging before surgery for treatment. All MR imaging voxels in the prostate were classified as cancer or noncancer on the basis of coregistered histopathologic data. Predictive models were developed by using more than one quantitative MR imaging parameter to generate CBS maps. Model development and evaluation of quantitative MR imaging parameters and CBS were performed separately for the peripheral zone and the whole gland. Model accuracy was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confidence intervals were calculated with the bootstrap procedure. The improvement in classification accuracy was evaluated by comparing the AUC for the multiparametric model and the single best-performing quantitative MR imaging parameter at the individual level and in aggregate. Results Quantitative T2, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), volume transfer constant (K(trans)), reflux rate constant (kep), and area under the gadolinium concentration curve at 90 seconds (AUGC90) were significantly different between cancer and noncancer voxels (P < .001), with ADC showing the best accuracy (peripheral zone AUC, 0.82; whole gland AUC, 0.74). Four-parameter models demonstrated the best performance in both the peripheral zone (AUC, 0.85; P = .010 vs ADC alone) and whole gland (AUC, 0.77; P = .043 vs ADC alone). Individual-level analysis showed statistically significant improvement in AUC in 82% (23 of 28) and 71% (24 of 34) of patients with peripheral-zone and whole-gland models, respectively, compared with ADC alone. Model-based CBS maps for cancer detection showed improved visualization of cancer location and extent. Conclusion Quantitative multiparametric MR imaging models developed by using coregistered correlative histopathologic data yielded a voxel-wise CBS that outperformed single quantitative MR imaging parameters for detection of prostate cancer, especially when the models were assessed at the individual level. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.