Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26761720›Full record

ArticleRadiology2016

Detection of Prostate Cancer: Quantitative Multiparametric MR Imaging Models Developed Using Registered Correlative Histopathology.

Gregory J Metzger, Chaitanya Kalavagunta, Benjamin Spilseth, Patrick J Bolan, Xiufeng Li, Diane Hutter, Jung W Nam, Andrew D Johnson, Jonathan C Henriksen, Laura Moench and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Short-duration dynamic [EJNMMI research · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Training Convolutional Networks for Prostate Segmentation With Limited Data.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gregory J MetzgerFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Chaitanya KalavaguntaFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Benjamin SpilsethFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Patrick J BolanFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Xiufeng LiFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Diane HutterFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Jung W NamFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Andrew D JohnsonFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Jonathan C HenriksenFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Laura MoenchFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Badrinath KonetyFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Christopher A WarlickFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Stephen C SchmechelFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).
Joseph S KoopmeinersFrom the Department of Radiology, Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455 (G.J.M., C.K., B.S., P.J.B., X.L., D.H., J.W.N.), Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (A.D.J., J.C.H., L.M., S.C.S.), Department of Urologic Surgery, Institute of Prostate and Urologic Cancers (B.K., C.A.W.), and Division of Biostatistics (J.S.K.).

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
NMR Imaging and SpectroscopyP41EB015894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2017
$8.4M
Development of an Optimal MRI Platform for Prostate Investigations at 7 TeslaR01CA155268 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI METZGER, GREGORY JOHN · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
Multi-parametric MRI Determination of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness and ExtentR01CA131013 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI METZGER, GREGORY JOHN · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131013NCI NIH HHS R01 CA155268NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015894
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose To develop multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging models to generate a quantitative, user-independent, voxel-wise composite biomarker score (CBS) for detection of prostate cancer by using coregistered correlative histopathologic results, and to compare performance of CBS-based detection with that of single quantitative MR imaging parameters. Materials and Methods Institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained. Patients with a diagnosis of prostate cancer underwent multiparametric MR imaging before surgery for treatment. All MR imaging voxels in the prostate were classified as cancer or noncancer on the basis of coregistered histopathologic data. Predictive models were developed by using more than one quantitative MR imaging parameter to generate CBS maps. Model development and evaluation of quantitative MR imaging parameters and CBS were performed separately for the peripheral zone and the whole gland. Model accuracy was evaluated by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and confidence intervals were calculated with the bootstrap procedure. The improvement in classification accuracy was evaluated by comparing the AUC for the multiparametric model and the single best-performing quantitative MR imaging parameter at the individual level and in aggregate. Results Quantitative T2, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), volume transfer constant (K(trans)), reflux rate constant (kep), and area under the gadolinium concentration curve at 90 seconds (AUGC90) were significantly different between cancer and noncancer voxels (P < .001), with ADC showing the best accuracy (peripheral zone AUC, 0.82; whole gland AUC, 0.74). Four-parameter models demonstrated the best performance in both the peripheral zone (AUC, 0.85; P = .010 vs ADC alone) and whole gland (AUC, 0.77; P = .043 vs ADC alone). Individual-level analysis showed statistically significant improvement in AUC in 82% (23 of 28) and 71% (24 of 34) of patients with peripheral-zone and whole-gland models, respectively, compared with ADC alone. Model-based CBS maps for cancer detection showed improved visualization of cancer location and extent. Conclusion Quantitative multiparametric MR imaging models developed by using coregistered correlative histopathologic data yielded a voxel-wise CBS that outperformed single quantitative MR imaging parameters for detection of prostate cancer, especially when the models were assessed at the individual level. (©) RSNA, 2016 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalProstatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID26761720
PMCPMC4868764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.