Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26761715›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2016

Exonic Splicing Mutations Are More Prevalent than Currently Estimated and Can Be Predicted by Using In Silico Tools.

Omar Soukarieh, Pascaline Gaildrat, Mohamad Hamieh, Aurélie Drouet, Stéphanie Baert-Desurmont, Thierry Frébourg, Mario Tosi, Alexandra Martins

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Tyrolean FounderBiomolecules · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrated Multiomics Validation of KeyBioMed research international · 2025
    Article
  13. Identification of a novel variant inGastroenterology report · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Three exonic variants in theFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Omar SoukariehInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Pascaline GaildratInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Mohamad HamiehInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Aurélie DrouetInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Stéphanie Baert-DesurmontInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Thierry FrébourgInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Mario TosiInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Alexandra MartinsInserm U1079-IRIB, University of Rouen, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Université de Rouen Normandie · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of a causal mutation is essential for molecular diagnosis and clinical management of many genetic disorders. However, even if next-generation exome sequencing has greatly improved the detection of nucleotide changes, the biological interpretation of most exonic variants remains challenging. Moreover, particular attention is typically given to protein-coding changes often neglecting the potential impact of exonic variants on RNA splicing. Here, we used the exon 10 of MLH1, a gene implicated in hereditary cancer, as a model system to assess the prevalence of RNA splicing mutations among all single-nucleotide variants identified in a given exon. We performed comprehensive minigene assays and analyzed patient's RNA when available. Our study revealed a staggering number of splicing mutations in MLH1 exon 10 (77% of the 22 analyzed variants), including mutations directly affecting splice sites and, particularly, mutations altering potential splicing regulatory elements (ESRs). We then used this thoroughly characterized dataset, together with experimental data derived from previous studies on BRCA1, BRCA2, CFTR and NF1, to evaluate the predictive power of 3 in silico approaches recently described as promising tools for pinpointing ESR-mutations. Our results indicate that ΔtESRseq and ΔHZEI-based approaches not only discriminate which variants affect splicing, but also predict the direction and severity of the induced splicing defects. In contrast, the ΔΨ-based approach did not show a compelling predictive power. Our data indicates that exonic splicing mutations are more prevalent than currently appreciated and that they can now be predicted by using bioinformatics methods. These findings have implications for all genetically-caused diseases.

Indexed as

Adaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinComputer SimulationCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorExonsFemaleHumansMutL Protein Homolog 1Neurofibromin 1Nuclear ProteinsOvarian NeoplasmsRNA Splice SitesRNA SplicingAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCFTR protein, humanCystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance RegulatorMLH1 protein, humanMutL Protein Homolog 1Neurofibromin 1Nuclear ProteinsRNA Splice Sites

Identifiers

PMID26761715
PMCPMC4711968
OpenAlexW2235359311

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.