Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26760674›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2016

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of dementia in clinically unevaluated people aged 65 and over in community and primary care populations.

Sam T Creavin, Susanna Wisniewski, Anna H Noel-Storr, Clare M Trevelyan, Thomas Hampton, Dane Rayment, Victoria M Thom, Kirsty J E Nash, Hosam Elhamoui, Rowena Milligan and 10 more

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 431 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
431citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
34.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05535790 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

PAX: A Randomized Single-blind Controlled Trial of the Effect of Circadian Light on Hospitalized Persons With Dementia and Older Adults With Cognitive Impairments

TypeinterventionalSponsorZealand University HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsDementia, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsNaturalistic LED light, Standard/traditional lighting
NCT05827276 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of the Life Story Questionnaire on Physical Therapy Participation in Patients With Dementia: A Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTexas Tech University Health Sciences CenterRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsDementia AlzheimersArmsLife story questionnaire
NCT07406659 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Early Effects of Different Inspiratory Muscle Training on Disease Clinical Course, Respiratory Parameters, Functional Capacity and Quality of Life in Patients With COPD

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of YalovaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled51ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary DiseaseArmsBasic Inspiratory Muscle Training, Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training, Control
NCT07576517 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Perioperative Use of Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Prevention of Neurocognitive Complications in Older Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery: a 2×2 Factorial Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2030Enrolled1,160ConditionsOlder Patients, Surgery, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsDex-Esk, Placebo, Active tDCS, Sham tDCS
NCT07576543 phase4not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Long-term Follow-up of Perioperative Dexmedetomidine-esketamine Combination and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Prevention of Neurocognitive Complications in Older Patients After Non-cardiac Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2026 to 2031Enrolled1,160ConditionsOlder Patients, Surgery, Dexmedetomidine, EsketamineArmsDex-Esk, Placebo, Active tDCS, Sham tDCS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

431 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 824 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Article

371 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Sam T CreavinSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Carynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, UK, BS8 2PS.
Susanna Wisniewski
Anna H Noel-Storr
Clare M Trevelyan
Thomas Hampton
Dane Rayment
Victoria M Thom
Kirsty J E Nash
Hosam Elhamoui
Rowena Milligan
Anish S Patel
Demitra V Tsivos
Tracey Wing
Emma Phillips
Sophie M Kellman
Hannah L Shackleton
Georgina F Singleton
Bethany E Neale
Martha E Watton
Sarah Cullum
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GBFrimley Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBGloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GBLeicester Frith Hospital · GBNHS Forth Valley · GBSomerset Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouthmead Hospital · GBTaunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBWest Suffolk Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/4001/05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) is a cognitive test that is commonly used as part of the evaluation for possible dementia.

objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at various cut points for dementia in people aged 65 years and over in community and primary care settings who had not undergone prior testing for dementia. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the specialised register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, MEDLINE (OvidSP), EMBASE (OvidSP), PsycINFO (OvidSP), LILACS (BIREME), ALOIS, BIOSIS previews (Thomson Reuters Web of Science), and Web of Science Core Collection, including the Science Citation Index and the Conference Proceedings Citation Index (Thomson Reuters Web of Science). We also searched specialised sources of diagnostic test accuracy studies and reviews: MEDION (Universities of Maastricht and Leuven, www.mediondatabase.nl), DARE (Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, via the Cochrane Library), HTA Database (Health Technology Assessment Database, via the Cochrane Library), and ARIF (University of Birmingham, UK, www.arif.bham.ac.uk). We attempted to locate possibly relevant but unpublished data by contacting researchers in this field. We first performed the searches in November 2012 and then fully updated them in May 2014. We did not apply any language or date restrictions to the electronic searches, and we did not use any methodological filters as a method to restrict the search overall. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included studies that compared the 11-item (maximum score 30) MMSE test (at any cut point) in people who had not undergone prior testing versus a commonly accepted clinical reference standard for all-cause dementia and subtypes (Alzheimer disease dementia, Lewy body dementia, vascular dementia, frontotemporal dementia). Clinical diagnosis included all-cause (unspecified) dementia, as defined by any version of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM); International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and the Clinical Dementia Rating. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: At least three authors screened all citations.Two authors handled data extraction and quality assessment. We performed meta-analysis using the hierarchical summary receiver-operator curves (HSROC) method and the bivariate method. MAIN

resultsWe retrieved 24,310 citations after removal of duplicates. We reviewed the full text of 317 full-text articles and finally included 70 records, referring to 48 studies, in our synthesis. We were able to perform meta-analysis on 28 studies in the community setting (44 articles) and on 6 studies in primary care (8 articles), but we could not extract usable 2 x 2 data for the remaining 14 community studies, which we did not include in the meta-analysis. All of the studies in the community were in asymptomatic people, whereas two of the six studies in primary care were conducted in people who had symptoms of possible dementia. We judged two studies to be at high risk of bias in the patient selection domain, three studies to be at high risk of bias in the index test domain and nine studies to be at high risk of bias regarding flow and timing. We assessed most studies as being applicable to the review question though we had concerns about selection of participants in six studies and target condition in one study.The accuracy of the MMSE for diagnosing dementia was reported at 18 cut points in the community (MMSE score 10, 14-30 inclusive) and 10 cut points in primary care (MMSE score 17-26 inclusive). The total number of participants in studies included in the meta-analyses ranged from 37 to 2727, median 314 (interquartile range (IQR) 160 to 647). In the community, the pooled accuracy at a cut point of 24 (15 studies) was sensitivity 0.85 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74 to 0.92), specificity 0.90 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95); at a cut point of 25 (10 studies), sensitivity 0.87 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.93), specificity 0.82 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.92); and in seven studies that adjusted accuracy estimates for level of education, sensitivity 0.97 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00), specificity 0.70 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.85). There was insufficient data to evaluate the accuracy of the MMSE for diagnosing dementia subtypes.We could not estimate summary diagnostic accuracy in primary care due to insufficient data. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe MMSE contributes to a diagnosis of dementia in low prevalence settings, but should not be used in isolation to confirm or exclude disease. We recommend that future work evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of tests in the context of the diagnostic pathway experienced by the patient and that investigators report how undergoing the MMSE changes patient-relevant outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAlzheimer DiseaseCommunity Health ServicesDementiaDementia, VascularHumansLewy Body DiseaseMental Status ScheduleNeuropsychological TestsPrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26760674
PMCPMC8812342
OpenAlexW2277613887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.