Evidence map›Paper›PMID 2676020›Full record

ReviewBlut1989

Monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis of immunodeficiencies.

R E Schmidt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Blut, 1989. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

R E SchmidtAbteilung Immunologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Federal Republic of Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in immunophenotyping is characterized by the availability of monoclonal antibodies and an increased number of clusters of differentiation consisting of reagents with known specificity and defined reactivity patterns. Technical improvements have lead to standardization of immunofluorescence staining procedures and broad application of flow cytometry. These developments have contributed to better diagnosis of immunodeficiencies characterized by the lack of certain lymphocyte subsets or more broadly expressed, functionally important cell-surface molecules. Antibodies valuable for routine immunophenotyping of immunodeficiencies as well as examples of the different antibody groups desirable for immunofluorescence studies are presented. When used in concert with clinical and other laboratory tests, immunophenotyping provides a valuable instrument for differential diagnosis of defects in the immune system. As a consequence, detection of new defects of cell surface antigens and respective cell subpopulations is facilitated and a basis is provided for further study of the genetic and molecular regulatory aspects of immunologic disorders.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationHLA AntigensHumansImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesLeukocytes, MononuclearLymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen-1Receptors, Leukocyte-AdhesionAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDAntigens, DifferentiationHLA AntigensLymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen-1Receptors, Leukocyte-Adhesion

Identifiers

PMID2676020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.