Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26760062›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2016

Progress and prospects for blood-stage malaria vaccines.

Kazutoyo Miura

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Serological evidence of continued exposure toFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Antibody levels to variant and conservedFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. An ImprovedAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  11. Malaria vaccines: a new era of prevention and control.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A landscape review of malaria vaccine candidates in the pipeline.Tropical diseases, travel medicine and vaccines · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Cross-reactivity of rbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kazutoyo Miuraa Laboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases , National Institutes of Health , Rockville , MD , USA.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · US

Funding

Host Immune Responses to Antigens of Malaria ParasitesZIAAI001020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI LONG, CAROLE · 2009 to 2025
$13.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There have been significant decreases in malaria mortality and morbidity in the last 10-15 years, and the most advanced pre-erythrocytic malaria vaccine, RTS,S, received a positive opinion from European regulators in July 2015. However, no blood-stage vaccine has reached a phase III trial. The first part of this review summarizes the pros and cons of various assays and models that have been and will be used to predict the efficacy of blood-stage vaccines. In the second part, blood-stage vaccine candidates that showed some efficacy in human clinical trials or controlled human malaria infection models are discussed. Then, candidates under clinical investigation are described in the third part, and other novel candidates and strategies are reviewed in the last part.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug DiscoveryHumansMalariaMalaria VaccinesMalaria Vaccinesblood-stagechallenge modelsclinical trialin vitro assaysMalariaPlasmodium falciparumvaccine

Identifiers

PMID26760062
PMCPMC4915341
OpenAlexW2264074478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.