ArticleRevista de saude publica2015
Validity and reliability of the Questionnaire for Compliance with Standard Precaution.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Educational technology on standard precautions for the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Nursing students.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Impact of Effort-Reward Imbalance and Burnout on the Compliance with Standard Precautions among Nurses and Midwives in Lebanese Hospitals.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Standard Precautions Compliance Instruments: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Impact of an educational intervention on standard precautions during the COVID-19 pandemic.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2023Article
- Validity and reliability of the Smoking-related Health Literacy Assessment Scale.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2022Article
- Validation of a reduced instrument Diabetes-21 for assessing health-related quality of life among people with diabetes.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2022Article
- Translation and validation of the Persian ICIQ bladder diary.International urogynecology journal · 2021Article
- Are the labour rooms of primary healthcare facilities capable of providing basic delivery and newborn services? A cross-sectional study.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2021Article
- Article
- Cultural Adaptation and Reliability of the Compliance with Standard Precautions Scale (CSPS) for Nurses in Brazil.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2017Article
- Knowledge of and adherence to standard precautions in a hemodialysis unit: a cross-sectional study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicinaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the validity and reliability of the Questionnaire for Compliance with Standard Precaution for nurses.
methodsThis methodological study was conducted with 121 nurses from health care facilities in Sao Paulo's countryside, who were represented by two high-complexity and by three average-complexity health care facilities. Internal consistency was calculated using Cronbach's alpha and stability was calculated by the intraclass correlation coefficient, through test-retest. Convergent, discriminant, and known-groups construct validity techniques were conducted.
resultsThe questionnaire was found to be reliable (Cronbach's alpha: 0.80; intraclass correlation coefficient: (0.97) In regards to the convergent and discriminant construct validity, strong correlation was found between compliance to standard precautions, the perception of a safe environment, and the smaller perception of obstacles to follow such precautions (r = 0.614 and r = 0.537, respectively). The nurses who were trained on the standard precautions and worked on the health care facilities of higher complexity were shown to comply more (p = 0.028 and p = 0.006, respectively).
conclusionsThe Brazilian version of the Questionnaire for Compliance with Standard Precaution was shown to be valid and reliable. Further investigation must be conducted with nurse samples that are more representative of the Brazilian reality. The use of the questionnaire may support the creation of educational measures considering the possible gaps that can be identified, focusing on the workers' health and on the patients' safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.