Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26759916›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2016

Completing the Link between Exposure Science and Toxicology for Improved Environmental Health Decision Making: The Aggregate Exposure Pathway Framework.

Justin G Teeguarden, Yu-Mei Tan, Stephen W Edwards, Jeremy A Leonard, Kim A Anderson, Richard A Corley, Molly L Kile, Staci M Simonich, David Stone, Robert L Tanguay and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Justin G TeeguardenHealth Effects and Exposure Science, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Yu-Mei TanNational Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Stephen W EdwardsNational Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Durham, North Carolina 27709, United States.
Jeremy A LeonardOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, United States.
Kim A AndersonDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
Richard A CorleyHealth Effects and Exposure Science, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Molly L KileSchool of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
Staci M SimonichDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
David StoneDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
Robert L TanguayDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
Katrina M WatersHealth Effects and Exposure Science, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory , Richland, Washington 99352, United States.
Stacey L HarperDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.
David E WilliamsDepartment of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University , Corvallis, Oregon 93771, United States.

Funding

Research Experience and Training Coordination CoreP42ES016465 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Robyn L Tanguay · 2009 to 2026
$52.5M
Reducing Susceptibility to Environmental Stress Throughout the Life SpanP30ES000210 · NIEHS · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BECKMAN, JOSEPH S · 1985 to 2015
$21.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES000210NIEHS NIH HHS P42 ES016465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Driven by major scientific advances in analytical methods, biomonitoring, computation, and a newly articulated vision for a greater impact in public health, the field of exposure science is undergoing a rapid transition from a field of observation to a field of prediction. Deployment of an organizational and predictive framework for exposure science analogous to the "systems approaches" used in the biological sciences is a necessary step in this evolution. Here we propose the aggregate exposure pathway (AEP) concept as the natural and complementary companion in the exposure sciences to the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) concept in the toxicological sciences. Aggregate exposure pathways offer an intuitive framework to organize exposure data within individual units of prediction common to the field, setting the stage for exposure forecasting. Looking farther ahead, we envision direct linkages between aggregate exposure pathways and adverse outcome pathways, completing the source to outcome continuum for more meaningful integration of exposure assessment and hazard identification. Together, the two frameworks form and inform a decision-making framework with the flexibility for risk-based, hazard-based, or exposure-based decision making.

Indexed as

Environmental HealthRisk AssessmentDecision MakingEnvironmental ExposureEnvironmental MonitoringHumansScienceToxicology

Identifiers

PMID26759916
PMCPMC4854780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.