Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26759655›Full record

Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2015

Derivation and Validation of Predictive Factors for Clinical Deterioration after Admission in Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Abnormal Vital Signs Without Shock.

Daniel J Henning, Kimie Oedorf, Danielle E Day, Colby S Redfield, Colin J Huguenel, Jonathan C Roberts, Leon D Sanchez, Richard E Wolfe, Nathan I Shapiro

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J HenningUniversity of Washington School of Medicine, Division of Emergency Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Kimie OedorfBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Danielle E DayBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Colby S RedfieldBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Colin J HuguenelBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan C RobertsBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leon D SanchezBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Richard E WolfeBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nathan I ShapiroBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStrategies to identify high-risk emergency department (ED) patients often use markedly abnormal vital signs and serum lactate levels. Risk stratifying such patients without using the presence of shock is challenging. The objective of the study is to identify independent predictors of in-hospital adverse outcomes in ED patients with abnormal vital signs or lactate levels, but who are not in shock.

methodsWe performed a prospective observational study of patients with abnormal vital signs or lactate level defined as heart rate ≥130 beats/min, respiratory rate ≥24 breaths/min, shock index ≥1, systolic blood pressure <90 mm/Hg, or lactate ≥4 mmole/L. We excluded patients with isolated atrial tachycardia, seizure, intoxication, psychiatric agitation, or tachycardia due to pain (ie: extremity fracture). The primary outcome was deterioration, defined as development of acute renal failure (creatinine 2× baseline), non-elective intubation, vasopressor requirement, or mortality. Independent predictors of deterioration after hospitalization were determined using logistic regression.

resultsOf 1,152 consecutive patients identified with abnormal vital signs or lactate level, 620 were excluded, leaving 532 for analysis. Of these, 53/532 (9.9±2.5%) deteriorated after hospital admission. Independent predictors of in-hospital deterioration were: lactate >4.0 mmol/L (OR 5.1, 95% CI [2.1-12.2]), age ≥80 yrs (OR 1.9, CI [1.0-3.7]), bicarbonate <21 mEq/L (OR 2.5, CI [1.3-4.9]), and initial HR≥130 (OR 3.1, CI [1.5-6.1]).

conclusionPatients exhibiting abnormal vital signs or elevated lactate levels without shock had significant rates of deterioration after hospitalization. ED clinical data predicted patients who suffered adverse outcomes with reasonable reliability.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationAgedBicarbonatesChronic DiseaseHealth StatusHospital MortalityHumansLactic AcidMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentTriageBicarbonatesLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID26759655
PMCPMC4703194
OpenAlexW2195469313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.