Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26759646›Full record

Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2015

Written Informed Consent for Computed Tomography of the Abdomen/Pelvis is Associated with Decreased CT Utilization in Low-Risk Emergency Department Patients.

Lisa H Merck, Laura A Ward, Kimberly E Applegate, Esther Choo, Douglas W Lowery-North, Katherine L Heilpern

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Feasibility of Informed Consent for Computed Tomography in Acute Trauma Patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2017
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa H MerckThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Emergency Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Providence, Rhode Island.
Laura A WardRollins School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kimberly E ApplegateEmory University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Atlanta, Georgia.
Esther ChooThe Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Department of Emergency Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island.
Douglas W Lowery-NorthEmory University School of Medicine and Grady Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Katherine L HeilpernEmory University School of Medicine and Grady Memorial Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe increasing rate of patient exposure to radiation from computerized tomography (CT) raises questions about appropriateness of utilization. There is no current standard to employ informed consent for CT (ICCT). Our study assessed the relationship between informed consent and CT utilization in emergency department (ED) patients.

methodsAn observational multiphase before-after cohort study was completed from 4/2010-5/2011. We assessed CT utilization before and after (Time I/Time II) the implementation of an informed consent protocol. Adult patients were included if they presented with symptoms of abdominal/pelvic pathology or completed ED CT. We excluded patients with pregnancy, trauma, or altered mental status. Data on history, exam, diagnostics, and disposition were collected via standard abstraction tool. We generated a multivariate logistic model via stepwise regression, to assess CT utilization across risk groups. Logistic models, stratified by risk, were generated to include study phase and a propensity score that controlled for potential confounders of CT utilization.

results7,684 patients met inclusion criteria. In PHASE 2, there was a 24% (95% CI [10-36%]) reduction in CT utilization in the low-risk patient group (p<0.002). ICCT did not affect CT utilization in the high-risk group (p=0.16). In low-risk patients, the propensity score was significant (p<0.001). There were no adverse events reported during the study period.

conclusionThe implementation of ICCT was associated with reduced CT utilization in low-risk ED patients. ICCT has the potential to increase informed, shared decision making with patients, as well as to reduce the risks and cost associated with CT.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentEmergency Service, HospitalFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvisPilot ProjectsRadiography, AbdominalRisk FactorsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID26759646
PMCPMC4703183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.