Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26759479›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2017

Facial Expressions Evoke Differential Neural Coupling in Macaques.

Ning Liu, Fadila Hadj-Bouziane, Rosalyn Moran, Leslie G Ungerleider, Alumit Ishai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Face-Selective Patches in Marmosets Are Involved in Dynamic and Static Facial Expression Processing.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. In Memory of Leslie G. Ungerleider.Neuroscience bulletin · 2021
    Article
  11. Parallel Processing of Facial Expression and Head Orientation in the Macaque Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ning LiuLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Fadila Hadj-BouzianeINSERM, U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Lyon, France.
Rosalyn MoranVirginia Tech Carilion Research Institute, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Leslie G UngerleiderLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Alumit IshaiLaboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Funding

Functional Anatomy of Face Processing in the Primate BrainZIAMH002918 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI UNGERLEIDER, LESLIE G · 2009 to 2021
$23.2M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans and monkeys, face perception activates a distributed cortical network that includes extrastriate, limbic, and prefrontal regions. Within face-responsive regions, emotional faces evoke stronger responses than neutral faces ("valence effect"). We used fMRI and Dynamic Causal Modeling (DCM) to test the hypothesis that emotional faces differentially alter the functional coupling among face-responsive regions. Three monkeys viewed conspecific faces with neutral, threatening, fearful, and appeasing expressions. Using Bayesian model selection, various models of neural interactions between the posterior (TEO) and anterior (TE) portions of inferior temporal (IT) cortex, the amygdala, the orbitofrontal (OFC), and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) were tested. The valence effect was mediated by feedback connections from the amygdala to TE and TEO, and feedback connections from VLPFC to the amygdala and TE. Emotional faces were associated with differential effective connectivity: Fearful faces evoked stronger modulations in the connections from the amygdala to TE and TEO; threatening faces evoked weaker modulations in the connections from the amygdala and VLPFC to TE; and appeasing faces evoked weaker modulations in the connection from VLPFC to the amygdala. Our results suggest dynamic alterations in neural coupling during the perception of behaviorally relevant facial expressions that are vital for social communication.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAmygdalaAnimalsBayes TheoremBrain MappingEmotionsEvoked PotentialsMacacaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysTemporal LobeconnectivityDCMemotionfacesprimates

Identifiers

PMID26759479
PMCPMC6075569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.