Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26758900›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2016

The influence of hormone therapies on colon and rectal cancer.

Lina Steinrud Mørch, Øjvind Lidegaard, Niels Keiding, Ellen Løkkegaard, Susanne Krüger Kjær

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Circulating Sex Hormone Levels and Colon Cancer Risk in Men: A Nested Case-Control Study and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The 2020 Menopausal Hormone Therapy Guidelines.Journal of menopausal medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lina Steinrud MørchGynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. linamorch@yahoo.dk.
Øjvind LidegaardGynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels KeidingDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ellen LøkkegaardGynecological-Obstetrical Department, North Zealand Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hillerød, Denmark.
Susanne Krüger KjærGynecological Clinic, The Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKDanish Cancer Society · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exogenous sex hormones seem to play a role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Little is known about the influence of different types or durations of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on colorectal cancer risk. A nationwide cohort of women 50-79 years old without previous cancer (n = 1,006,219) were followed 1995-2009. Information on HT exposures was from the National Prescription Register and updated daily, while information on colon (n = 8377) and rectal cancers (n = 4742) were from the National Cancer Registry. Potential confounders were obtained from other national registers. Poisson regression analyses with 5-year age bands included hormone exposures as time-dependent covariates. Use of estrogen-only therapy and combined therapy were associated with decreased risks of colon cancer (adjusted incidence rate ratio 0.77, 95 % confidence interval 0.68-0.86 and 0.88, 0.80-0.96) and rectal cancer (0.83, 0.72-0.96 and 0.89, 0.80-1.00), compared to never users. Transdermal estrogen-only therapy implied more protection than oral administration, while no significant influence was found of regimen, progestin type, nor of tibolone. The benefit of HT was stronger for long-term hormone users; and hormone users were at lower risk of advanced stage of colorectal cancer, which seems supportive for a causal association between hormone therapy and colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

PostmenopauseAgedColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsDenmarkEstrogen Replacement TherapyEstrogensFemaleHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPopulation SurveillanceRectal NeoplasmsRegistriesRisk AssessmentEstrogensColon cancerHormone replacement therapyRectum cancerStage of diseaseTypes of hormone therapy

Identifiers

PMID26758900
OpenAlexW2233579048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.