Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26758459›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2016

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation results in supraphysiologic DHEA-S serum levels and progesterone assay interference that may impact clinical management in IVF.

Jason M Franasiak, Semara Thomas, Susan Ng, Maria Fano, Andrew Ruiz, Richard T Scott, Eric J Forman

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Analytical Validation of the IMMULITEAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The curious case of premature luteinization.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jason M FranasiakReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA. jfranasiak@rmanj.com.
Semara ThomasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Susan NgReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Maria FanoReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Andrew RuizReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Richard T ScottReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Eric J FormanReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, 140 Allen Road, Basking Ridge, NJ, 07920, USA.
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey · USJohnson University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is often prescribed for poor responders in IVF in an effort to improve response to ovarian stimulation. The effect of DHEA supplementation and resultant supraphysiologic DHEA-S serum levels on sex steroid assays has not been evaluated in this population. This study seeks to determine the relationship between DHEA supplementation and progesterone measurements to characterize the degree of interference with particular immunoassays.

methodsCharacterization was accomplished in two phases. First, DHEA-S standard control reagents with no progesterone present were assayed for both DHEA-S and progesterone levels. Second, serum pools from 60 unique IVF patients' serum were used to create six pooled serum samples: three from patients on DHEA supplementation and three from patients not on DHEA supplementation. The three pools were composed of patients whose serum fell into low, medium, and high progesterone ranges. Baseline DHEA-S and progesterone were measured, and the mean level of DHEA-S in the mid-range progesterone pool was used as the mid-point for addition of DHEA-S standard to the serum pools from patients without DHEA supplementation. Progesterone from these pools was then measured on three commercially available immunoassay systems.

resultsThe first experiment revealed a linear increase in progesterone when analyzing the DHEA-S standard ranging from 0.5 μg/dL [corrected] in the blank control (no DHEA-S) to up to 2.0 μg/dL [corrected] in the high control (DHEA-S >700 μg/dL), [corrected] indicating that the DHEA-S cross-reacts with the progesterone assays. In the second experiment, patients' serum DHEA-S and progesterone were measured from pooled serum samples of those taking DHEA and those not taking DHEA. Adding DHEA-S to the pooled serum of those not taking DHEA resulted in a linear increase in progesterone levels on two of three commercially available immunoassays (p < 0.05).

conclusionsDHEA-S can interfere with standard progesterone immunoassays used in clinical ART programs, and thus serum progesterone levels in IVF patients on DHEA supplementation may not reflect truly bioactive progesterone.

Indexed as

DehydroepiandrosteroneFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansImmunoassayOvulation InductionProgesteroneDehydroepiandrosteroneProgesteroneDHEADHEA-SImmunoassayIVFProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID26758459
PMCPMC4785155
OpenAlexW2233788899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.