ArticleImmunogenetics2016
Understanding the obstacle of incompatibility at residue 156 within HLA-B*35 subtypes.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peptidomes and Structures Illustrate Two Distinguishing Mechanisms of Alternating the Peptide Plasticity Caused by Swine MHC Class I Micropolymorphism.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Conserved epitopes with high HLA-I population coverage are targets of CD8Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The polymorphism at residue 156 determines the HLA-B*35 restricted peptide repertoire during HCMV infection.Immunogenetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Defining permissive and non-permissive mismatches for transplantation is a demanding challenge. Single mismatches at amino acid (AA) position 156 of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) class I have been described to alter the peptide motif, repertoire, or mode of peptide loading through differential interaction with the peptide-loading complex. Hence, a single mismatch can tip the balance and trigger an immunological reaction. HLA-B*35 subtypes have been described to evade the loading complex, 156 mismatch distinguishing B*35:01 and B*35:08 changes the binding groove sufficiently to alter the sequence features of the selected peptide repertoire. To understand the functional influences of residue 156 in B*35 variants, we analyzed the peptide binding profiles of HLA-B*35:01(156Leu), B*35:08(156Arg) and B*35:62(156Trp). The glycoprotein tapasin represents a target for immune evasions and functions within the multimeric peptide-loading complex to stabilize empty class I molecules and promote acquisition of high-affinity peptides. All three B*35 subtypes showed a tapasin-independent mode of peptide acquisition. HLA-B*35-restricted peptides of low- and high-binding affinities were recovered in the presence and absence of tapasin and subsequently sequenced utilizing mass spectrometry. The peptides derived from B*35 variants differ substantially in their features dependent on their mode of recruitment; all peptides were preferentially anchored by Pro at p2 and Tyr, Phe, Leu, or Lys at pΩ. However, the Trp at residue 156 altered the p2 motif to an Ala and restricted the pΩ to a Trp. Our results highlight the importance of understanding the impact of key micropolymorphism and how a single AA mismatch orchestrates the neighboring AAs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.