Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26758031›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

PTESFinder: a computational method to identify post-transcriptional exon shuffling (PTES) events.

Osagie G Izuogu, Abd A Alhasan, Hani M Alafghani, Mauro Santibanez-Koref, David J Elliott, David J Elliot, Michael S Jackson

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Role of Circular RNA in Kidney-Related Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021
    Article
  17. A genome-wide circular RNA transcriptome in rat.Biology methods & protocols · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Osagie G IzuoguInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. g.izuogu@ncl.ac.uk.
Abd A AlhasanInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. abd.al-hasan@newcastle.ac.uk.
Hani M AlafghaniSecurity Forces Hostpital, P. O. Box 2748-24268-8541, Makkah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. hani940@hotmail.com.
Mauro Santibanez-KorefInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. mauro.santibanez-koref@ncl.ac.uk.
David J Elliott
David J ElliotInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. david.elliot@ncl.ac.uk.
Michael S JacksonInstitute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK. michael.jackson@ncl.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014516/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT089225MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranscripts, which have been subject to Post-transcriptional exon shuffling (PTES), have an exon order inconsistent with the underlying genomic sequence. These have been identified in a wide variety of tissues and cell types from many eukaryotes, and are now known to be mostly circular, cytoplasmic, and non-coding. Although there is no uniformly ascribed function, several have been shown to be involved in gene regulation. Accurate identification of these transcripts can, however, be difficult due to artefacts from a wide variety of sources.

resultsHere, we present a computational method, PTESFinder, to identify these transcripts from high throughput RNAseq data. Uniquely, it systematically excludes potential artefacts emanating from pseudogenes, segmental duplications, and template switching, and outputs both PTES and canonical exon junction counts to facilitate comparative analyses. In comparison with four existing methods, PTESFinder achieves highest specificity and comparable sensitivity at a variety of read depths. PTESFinder also identifies between 13 % and 41.6 % more structures, compared to publicly available methods recently used to identify human circular RNAs.

conclusionsWith high sensitivity and specificity, user-adjustable filters that target known sources of false positives, and tailored output to facilitate comparison of transcript levels, PTESFinder will facilitate the discovery and analysis of these poorly understood transcripts.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGene Expression RegulationRNAComputational BiologyExonsGenomeGenomicsHumansRNA, CircularSoftwareRNARNA, Circular

Identifiers

PMID26758031
PMCPMC4711006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.