Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26757983›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

Genomic complexity of urothelial bladder cancer revealed in urinary cfDNA.

Fiona S Togneri, Douglas G Ward, Joseph M Foster, Adam J Devall, Paula Wojtowicz, Sofia Alyas, Fabiana Ramos Vasques, Assa Oumie, Nicholas D James, K K Cheng and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Advances in Liquid Biopsy for Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer.International neurourology journal · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Circulating tumour DNA - looking beyond the blood.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Fiona S TogneriWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Douglas G WardInstitute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Joseph M FosterAffymetrix UK Ltd, High Wycombe, UK.
Adam J DevallInstitute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Paula WojtowiczWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Sofia AlyasWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Fabiana Ramos VasquesWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Assa OumieAffymetrix UK Ltd, High Wycombe, UK.
Nicholas D JamesCancer Research Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
K K ChengSchool of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Maurice P ZeegersDepartment of Complex Genetics, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands.
Nayneeta DeshmukhInstitute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Brendan O'SullivanDepartment of Histopathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Philippe TaniereDepartment of Histopathology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Karen G SpinkAffymetrix UK Ltd, High Wycombe, UK.
Dominic J McMullanWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mike GriffithsWest Midland Regional Genetics Laboratory, Birmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Richard T BryanInstitute of Cancer & Genomic Sciences, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urothelial bladder cancers (UBCs) have heterogeneous clinical characteristics that are mirrored in their diverse genomic profiles. Genomic profiling of UBCs has the potential to benefit routine clinical practice by providing prognostic utility above and beyond conventional clinicopathological factors, and allowing for prediction and surveillance of treatment responses. Urinary DNAs representative of the tumour genome provide a promising resource as a liquid biopsy for non-invasive genomic profiling of UBCs. We compared the genomic profiles of urinary cellular DNA and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the urine with matched diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour DNAs for 23 well-characterised UBC patients. Our data show urinary DNAs to be highly representative of patient tumours, allowing for detection of recurrent clinically actionable genomic aberrations. Furthermore, a greater aberrant load (indicative of tumour genome) was observed in cfDNA over cellular DNA (P<0.001), resulting in a higher analytical sensitivity for detection of clinically actionable genomic aberrations (P<0.04) when using cfDNA. Thus, cfDNA extracted from the urine of UBC patients has a higher tumour genome burden and allows greater detection of key genomic biomarkers (90%) than cellular DNA from urine (61%) and provides a promising resource for robust whole-genome tumour profiling of UBC with potential to influence clinical decisions without invasive patient interventions.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaChromosome AberrationsDNA, NeoplasmHumansUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkers, TumorDNA, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID26757983
PMCPMC4970693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.