Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26757938›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational medicine2016

A novel, clinically relevant use of a piglet model to study the effects of anesthetics on the developing brain.

Emmett E Whitaker, Bruno Bissonnette, Andrew D Miller, Tanner L Koppert, Joseph D Tobias, Christopher R Pierson, Fievos L Christofi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adult and Pediatric Porcine Model of Acute Volume Overload.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmett E WhitakerDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. emmett.whitaker@nationwidechildrens.org.
Bruno BissonnetteDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. bruno@brainstorm-anesthesia.com.
Andrew D MillerSection of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, T5-006A Veterinary Research Tower, Tower Rd., Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. andrew.miller@cornell.edu.
Tanner L KoppertDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. tanner.koppert@nationwidechildrens.org.
Joseph D TobiasDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. joseph.tobias@nationwidechildrens.org.
Christopher R PiersonDepartment of Pathology and Anatomy, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. christopher.pierson@nationwidechildrens.org.
Fievos L ChristofiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 410 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. Fedias.Christofi@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USNew York State College of Veterinary Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnesthesia-induced neurotoxicity research in the developing brain must rely upon an unimpeachable animal model and a standardized treatment approach. In this manner, identification of mechanisms of action may be undertaken. The goal of this study was to develop a novel, clinically relevant, translational way to use a piglet model to investigate anesthesia effects on the developing brain.

methods29 newborn piglets were assigned to either: (1) control (no intervention, n = 10); (2) lipopolysaccharide (LPS; positive inflammatory control, n = 9); or (3) isoflurane anesthesia (n = 10). Positive inflammatory control animals were given 100 mcg/kg LPS from Escherichia coli intraperitoneally (IP) on the same day as those receiving isoflurane. Isoflurane was administered for 3 h while care was taken to ensure human perioperative conditions. To establish a clinical scenario, each animal was intubated and monitored with pulse oximetry, invasive and non-invasive blood pressure, electrocardiogram, temperature, end-tidal CO2, anesthetic concentration, and iSTAT blood analysis. All animals were sacrificed after 48 h using transcardiac perfusion of ice-cold, heparinized phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4 % paraformaldehyde (PFA). Brains were collected and histopathological analysis focused on the entorhinal cortex looking for degenerative changes due to its critical role in learning and memory. Reliable identification of entorhinal cortex was achieved by using colored ink on the surface of the brains, which was then cross-referenced with microscopic anatomy. Hematoxylin & eosin-stained high-power fields was used to quantify cells. ImageJ™ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to count absolute number of progenitor glial cells (PGC) and number of PGCs per cluster. Immunohistochemistry was also utilized to ensure positive identification of cellular structures.

resultsHistopathological sections of 28 brains were analyzed. One animal in the LPS group died shortly after administration, presumably from inadvertent intravascular injection. There was an acute basal ganglia ischemic infarct in one isoflurane-treated animal. A large number of small, round nucleated cells were seen throughout layer II of the entorhinal cortex in all animals. These cells were identified as PGCs using immunohistochemistry and light microscopy. Although there was no difference in the absolute number of PGCs between the groups, animals given isoflurane or LPS demonstrated a significant increase in cells forming 'clusters' in the entorhinal cortex. An apparent change in the pattern of doublecortin labeling also suggests changes in neuronal precursors and undifferentiated neurons.

conclusionsThis study represents the first novel use of a clinically relevant neonatal piglet model to study anesthesia effects on the developing brain. LPS induces neuroinflammation, and this is a potential mechanism for LPS and perhaps isoflurane in causing a change in progenitor cell distribution. We postulate that the isoflurane-induced change in glial progenitor cell distribution could have important implications for cell differentiation, maturation and neural circuit behavior in the rapidly developing brain.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaHippocampusIsofluraneNeurocognitive outcomeNeurodevelopmentNeuroinflammationNeurotoxicityPiglets

Identifiers

PMID26757938
PMCPMC4710621
OpenAlexW2239976533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.