ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2016
Antitumor activity of Cetuximab in combination with Ixabepilone on triple negative breast cancer stem cells.
Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing EGFR Inhibition: Monensin and Erlotinib Synergize to Eliminate Cancer Stem Cells in Canine Mammary Tumours.Veterinary and comparative oncology · 2026Article
- Red blood cell-derived extracellular vesicles enable cisplatin and cetuximab combined therapy against triple-negative breast cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- [Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- An overview of autophagy inhibition as a potential clinical strategy in cancer therapy.Molecular pharmacology · 2025Review
- EGFR-to-Src family tyrosine kinase switching in proliferating-DTP TNBC cells creates a hyperphosphorylation-dependent vulnerability to EGFR TKI.Cancer cell international · 2025Article
- Advances in Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Immunotherapeutic and Targeted Strategies.Current molecular medicine · 2025Review
- Potential therapeutic targets of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway in triple-negative breast cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Dysregulated Ribosome Biogenesis Is a Targetable Vulnerability in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: MRPS27 as a Key Mediator of the Stemness-inhibitory Effect of Lovastatin.International journal of biological sciences · 2024Article
- The Efficacy of CB-103, a First-in-Class Transcriptional Notch Inhibitor, in Preclinical Models of Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2023Article
- Anti-Androgenic Therapies Targeting the Luminal Androgen Receptor of a Typical Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Review
- Tumor microenvironment enriches the stemness features: the architectural event of therapy resistance and metastasis.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- The ixabepilone and vandetanib combination shows synergistic activity in docetaxel-resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022Article
- Review
- Nucleolar and Coiled-Body Phosphoprotein 1 Is Associated With Stemness and Represents a Potential Therapeutic Target in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Stem cell therapy: A paradigm shift in breast cancer treatment.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Potentiating Therapeutic Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
- Overview of New Treatments with Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer and a Proposal of a Combination Therapy.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Simultaneous targeting of HER family pro-survival signaling with Pan-HER antibody mixture is highly effective in TNBC: a preclinical trial with PDXs.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeveloping novel strategies against treatment-resistant triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells remains a significant challenge. The ErbB family, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), plays key roles in metastasis, tumorigenesis, cell proliferation, and drug resistance. Recently, these characteristics have been linked to a small subpopulation of cells classified as cancer stem cells (CSC) which are believed to be responsible for tumor initiation and maintenance. Ixabepilone is a new generation microtubule-stabilizing agent, which has been expected to be more efficacious than conventional taxanes. Here we aim to investigate whether the EGFR monoclonal antibody Cetuximab, in combination with Ixabepilone, is more effective in eliminating CSC populations compared to chemotherapy alone in TNBC.
methodsRepresentative TNBC cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and SUM159) were used to evaluate breast CSC populations. We used fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis (CD44(+) and CD24(-/low), or Aldefluor(+)) and a self-renewal assay called mammosphere formation efficiency (MSFE) to measure CSC population size after treatment with Cetuximab, or Cetuximab plus Ixabepilone in vitro.
resultsAlthough there was no significant decrease in cell viability, Cetuximab reduced MSFE and the CSC population in breast cancer cells in vitro and in vivo through inhibition of autophagy. Also, SUM159 and MDA-MB-231 orthotopic tumors demonstrated partial response to Centuximab or Ixabepilone monotherapy; however, the effect of the combination treatment was significant only in SUM159 tumors (p <0.0001), when compared to Ixabepilone alone.
conclusionsOverall, our findings demonstrate that EGFR-targeted therapy by Cetuximab effectively reduces the CSC population in TNBC tumors. However, combination therapy with Ixabepilone may be effective only in a small subset of TNBCs, warranting further investigation of alternative approaches to target multiple pathways for TNBC treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.