Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26757406›Full record

ReviewNucleic acid therapeutics2016

Fit for the Eye: Aptamers in Ocular Disorders.

Daniel W Drolet, Louis S Green, Larry Gold, Nebojsa Janjic

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Current Trends in Clinical Trials of Prodrugs.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Therapeutic Applications of Aptamers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel W DroletSomaLogic, Inc. , Boulder, Colorado.
Louis S GreenSomaLogic, Inc. , Boulder, Colorado.
Larry GoldSomaLogic, Inc. , Boulder, Colorado.
Nebojsa JanjicSomaLogic, Inc. , Boulder, Colorado.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For any new class of therapeutics, there are certain types of indications that represent a natural fit. For nucleic acid ligands in general, and aptamers in particular, the eye has historically been an attractive site for therapeutic intervention. In this review, we recount the discovery and early development of three aptamers designated for use in ophthalmology, one approved (Macugen), and two in late-stage development (Fovista and Zimura). Every one of these molecules was originally intended for other indications. Key improvements in technology, specifically with regard to libraries used for in vitro selection and subsequent chemical optimization of aptamers, have played an important role in allowing the identification of development candidates with suitable properties. The lessons learned from the selection of these molecules are valuable for informing us about the many remaining opportunities for aptamer-based therapeutics in ophthalmology as well as for identifying additional indications for which aptamers as a class of therapeutics have distinct advantages.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideEye DiseasesHumansLigandsOphthalmologySELEX Aptamer TechniqueAptamers, NucleotideLigandspegaptanib

Identifiers

PMID26757406
PMCPMC4900223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.