Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26757261›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

E-Cadherin fragments as potential mediators for peritoneal metastasis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Fabian Trillsch, Sascha Kuerti, Christine Eulenburg, Eike Burandt, Linn Woelber, Katharina Prieske, Kathrin Eylmann, Leticia Oliveira-Ferrer, Karin Milde-Langosch, Sven Mahner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fabian TrillschDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Sascha KuertiDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Christine EulenburgDepartment of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Eike BurandtInstitute of Pathology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Linn WoelberDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Katharina PrieskeDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Kathrin EylmannDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Leticia Oliveira-FerrerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Karin Milde-LangoschDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
Sven MahnerDepartment of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr 52, Hamburg 20246, Germany.
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUkrainian Free University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal dissemination and retroperitoneal lymph node involvement are main routes for tumour spread of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), possibly determined by the intercellular connecting protein E-Cadherin (E-Cad) and its fragments.

methodsTumour tissue of 105 advanced EOC patients was evaluated for protein expression of E-Cad, β-Catenin and Calpain by western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Expression patterns were compared between tumours with solely intraperitoneal (pT3c, pN0; n=41) and tumours with retroperitoneal metastases (pT1a-3c, pN1; n=64). Lysates of the EOC cell line SKOV3 and tumour tissue from the intraperitoneal group were tested for E-Cad expression following Calpain treatment.

resultsE-Cad full-length (E-Cad-FL, 120 kDa) and two major fragments at 85 kDa (E-Cad-85) and 23 kDa (E-Cad-23) were detected by western blotting. E-Cad-85 expression was significantly higher in tumours with solely intraperitoneal metastases and correlated strongly with E-Cad-23 and the protease Calpain. Calpain-mediated cleavage was identified as a potential mechanism to generate E-Cad-85 from E-Cad-FL by treating lysates from SKOV3 cells and tumour tissue with this enzyme. Increased cytoplasmic localisation of β-Catenin in tumours with high E-Cad-85 expression corroborates that E-Cad-85 loses the binding site for β-Catenin after fragmentation, enabling tumour cluster formation and peritoneal dissemination.

conclusionsCalpain-mediated E-Cad fragmentation appears to promote intraperitoneal EOC progression. Understanding these mechanisms might eventually lead to new tailored subtype-specific diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overbeta CateninBlotting, WesternCadherinsCalpainCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialCell Line, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryLymph NodesMiddle AgedNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian Neoplasmsbeta CateninCadherinsCalpainPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

PMID26757261
PMCPMC4815811
OpenAlexW2237151091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.