Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26757216›Full record

Trial reportHuman brain mapping2016

Predicting beneficial effects of atomoxetine and citalopram on response inhibition in Parkinson's disease with clinical and neuroimaging measures.

Zheng Ye, Charlotte L Rae, Cristina Nombela, Timothy Ham, Timothy Rittman, Peter Simon Jones, Patricia Vázquez Rodríguez, Ian Coyle-Gilchrist, Ralf Regenthal, Ellemarije Altena and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Locus Coeruleus Integrity Is Linked to Response Inhibition Deficits in Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Advances in neuroimaging to support translational medicine in dementia.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Zheng YeDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Charlotte L RaeDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cristina NombelaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Timothy HamDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Timothy RittmanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter Simon JonesDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Patricia Vázquez RodríguezDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ian Coyle-GilchristDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Ralf RegenthalDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Rudolf-Boehm-Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Ellemarije AltenaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Charlotte R HousdenDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Helen MaxwellDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Barbara J SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Roger A BarkerDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Trevor W RobbinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
James B RoweDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBNeuroscience Institute · ITInstitute of Pharmacology · CZMedical Research Council · GBMRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council G1100464Medical Research Council MC_U105597119Medical Research Council MC_US_A060_0016Medical Research Council MR/M009041/1Medical Research Council MR/M024873/1Medical Research Council RG62761Wellcome Trust 093875Wellcome Trust 103838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that selective noradrenergic (atomoxetine) and serotonergic (citalopram) reuptake inhibitors may improve response inhibition in selected patients with Parkinson's disease, restoring behavioral performance and brain activity. We reassessed the behavioral efficacy of these drugs in a larger cohort and developed predictive models to identify patient responders. We used a double-blind randomized three-way crossover design to investigate stopping efficiency in 34 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease after 40 mg atomoxetine, 30 mg citalopram, or placebo. Diffusion-weighted and functional imaging measured microstructural properties and regional brain activations, respectively. We confirmed that Parkinson's disease impairs response inhibition. Overall, drug effects on response inhibition varied substantially across patients at both behavioral and brain activity levels. We therefore built binary classifiers with leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) to predict patients' responses in terms of improved stopping efficiency. We identified two optimal models: (1) a "clinical" model that predicted the response of an individual patient with 77-79% accuracy for atomoxetine and citalopram, using clinically available information including age, cognitive status, and levodopa equivalent dose, and a simple diffusion-weighted imaging scan; and (2) a "mechanistic" model that explained the behavioral response with 85% accuracy for each drug, using drug-induced changes of brain activations in the striatum and presupplementary motor area from functional imaging. These data support growing evidence for the role of noradrenaline and serotonin in inhibitory control. Although noradrenergic and serotonergic drugs have highly variable effects in patients with Parkinson's disease, the individual patient's response to each drug can be predicted using a pattern of clinical and neuroimaging features.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAgedAtomoxetine HydrochlorideBrainCitalopramCross-Over StudiesDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsParkinson DiseasePrognosisPsychomotor PerformanceAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideCitalopramPsychotropic DrugsSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorsimpulsivitymachine learningnoradrenalineParkinson's diseaseresponse inhibitionserotoninstratification

Identifiers

PMID26757216
PMCPMC4819701
OpenAlexW2235686152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.