Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26756547›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2016

Hair Follicle Bulge Stem Cells Appear Dispensable for the Acute Phase of Wound Re-epithelialization.

Clare L Garcin, David M Ansell, Denis J Headon, Ralf Paus, Matthew J Hardman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. The Utility of De-epithelialization in Subcutaneous Skin Flap Transposition.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Clare L GarcinThe Healing Foundation Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
David M AnsellThe Healing Foundation Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Denis J HeadonThe Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Ralf PausInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Matthew J HardmanThe Healing Foundation Centre, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
LGBT Foundation · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBUniversity of Münster · DE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cutaneous healing response has evolved to occur rapidly, in order to minimize infection and to re-establish epithelial homeostasis. Rapid healing is achieved through complex coordination of multiple cell types, which importantly includes specific cell populations within the hair follicle (HF). Under physiological conditions, the epithelial compartments of HF and interfollicular epidermis remain discrete, with K15(+ve) bulge stem cells contributing progeny for HF reconstruction during the hair cycle and as a basis for hair shaft production during anagen. Only upon wounding do HF cells migrate from the follicle to contribute to the neo-epidermis. However, the identity of the first-responding cells, and in particular whether this process involves a direct contribution of K15(+ve) bulge cells to the early stage of epidermal wound repair remains unclear. Here we demonstrate that epidermal injury in murine skin does not induce bulge activation during early epidermal wound repair. Specifically, bulge cells of uninjured HFs neither proliferate nor appear to migrate out of the bulge niche upon epidermal wounding. In support of these observations, Diphtheria toxin-mediated partial ablation of K15(+ve) bulge cells fails to delay wound healing. Our data suggest that bulge cells only respond to epidermal wounding during later stages of repair. We discuss that this response may have evolved as a protective safeguarding mechanism against bulge stem cell exhaust and tumorigenesis. Stem Cells 2016;34:1377-1385.

Indexed as

Re-EpithelializationAnimalsApoptosisCell MovementCell ProliferationHair FollicleIntegrasesMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicModels, BiologicalStem Cell NicheStem CellsCre recombinaseIntegrasesBulgeHair follicleSkinWound healing

Identifiers

PMID26756547
PMCPMC4985639
OpenAlexW2237280853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.