Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26756405›Full record

ArticleJournal of X-ray science and technology2015

Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.

Muhammad U Ghani, Aimin Yan, Molly D Wong, Yuhua Li, Liqiang Ren, Xizeng Wu, Hong Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of X-ray science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Detectability comparison of simulated tumors in digital breast tomosynthesis using high-energy X-ray inline phase sensitive and commercial imaging systems.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterization of Continuous and Pulsed Emission modes of a Hybrid Micro Focus X-ray Source for Medical Imaging Applications.Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad U GhaniCenter for Bioengineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Aimin YanDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Molly D WongCenter for Bioengineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Yuhua LiCenter for Bioengineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Liqiang RenCenter for Bioengineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Xizeng WuDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Hong LiuCenter for Bioengineering and School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
University of Oklahoma · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Clinical Translation of High Energy Phase-Sensitive X-ray Breast TomosynthesisR01CA193378 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI FAJARDO, LAURIE L, JING, ZHENXUE · 2015 to 2019
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the optimization of a high energy in-line phase sensitive x-ray imaging prototype under different geometric and operating conditions for mammography application. A phase retrieval algorithm based on phase attenuation duality (PAD) was applied to the phase contrast images acquired by the prototype. Imaging performance was investigated at four magnification values of 1.67, 2, 2.5 and 3 using an acrylic edge, an American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography phantom and contrast detail (CD) phantom with tube potentials of 100, 120 and 140 kVp. The ACR and CD images were acquired at the same mean glandular dose (MGD) of 1.29 mGy with a computed radiography (CR) detector of 43.75 μm pixel pitch at a fixed source to image distance (SID) of 170 cm. The x-ray tube focal spot size was kept constant as 7 μm while a 2.5 mm thick aluminum (Al) filter was used for beam hardening. The performance of phase contrast and phase retrieved images were compared with computer simulations based on the relative phase contrast factor (RPF) at high x-ray energies. The imaging results showed that the x-ray tube operated at 100 kVp under the magnification of 2.5 exhibits superior imaging performance which is in accordance to the computer simulations. As compared to the phase contrast images, the phase retrieved images of the ACR and CD phantoms demonstrated improved imaging contrast and target discrimination. We compared the CD phantom images acquired in conventional contact mode with and without the anti-scatter grid using the same prototype at 1.295 mGy and 2.59 mGy using 40 kVp, a 25 μm rhodium (Rh) filter. At the same radiation dose, the phase sensitive images provided improved detection capabilities for both the large and small discs, while compared to the double dose image acquired in conventional mode, the observer study also indicated that the phase sensitive images provided improved detection capabilities for the large discs. This study therefore validates the potential of using high energy phase contrast x-ray imaging to improve lesion detection and reduce radiation dose for clinical applications such as mammography.

Indexed as

Absorption, RadiationBreast NeoplasmsHumansMammographyPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityhigh energymammographyphase contrastphase retrievalPhase sensitivex-ray imaging

Identifiers

PMID26756405
PMCPMC4711281
OpenAlexW2234405336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.