ArticlePerspectives in health information managemen2015
Diffusion and Use of Tethered Personal Health Records in Primary Care.
Article in Perspectives in health information managemen, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The impact of eHealth use on general practice workload in the pre-COVID-19 era: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2024Pooled it
- Electronic Medical Record-Based Electronic Messaging Among Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Pooled it
- Quantifying Patient Portal Use: Systematic Review of Utilization Metrics.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Functions and Outcomes of Personal Health Records for Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.Perspectives in health information managemen · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Personal Health Record implementation in rural primary care: A descriptive exploratory study using RE-AIM framework.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Factors Associated with Reducing Disparities in Electronic Personal Heath Records Use Among Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic Adults.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Partnering with patients and families living with chronic conditions to coproduce diagnostic safety through OurDX: a previsit online engagement tool.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- A Patient-Centered Approach to Writing Ambulatory Visit Notes in the Cures Act Era.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Healthcare providers' readiness for electronic health record adoption: a cross-sectional study during pre-implementation phase.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Accessing Patient Electronic Health Record Portals Safely Using Social Credentials: Demonstration Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Impact of Patient Access to Online VA Notes on Healthcare Utilization and Clinician Documentation: a Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION OF STANDALONE PERSONAL HEALTH RECORD USE BY PATIENTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES.Perspectives in health information management · 2021Article
- Capturing the Impact of Patient Portals Based on the Quadruple Aim and Benefits Evaluation Frameworks: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Advance Care Planning Among Users of a Patient Portal During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Observational
- Article
- Developing mobile self-tracking for chronic disease prevention: Why listening to users matters?International journal of public health · 2020Article
- Converging perspectives of providers and student users on extending a patient portal into a university-based mental health service: A qualitative study.Internet interventions · 2020Article
- Characteristics of Women Enrolled in a Patient Portal Intervention for Menopause.Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPersonal health records (PHRs) enable patients to access their healthcare information in a secure environment, increasing patient engagement in medical care. PHRs can be tethered to a patient's electronic health record (EHR). Tethered PHRs, also known as patient portals, allow patients to access relevant medical information from their provider. Despite recent policy efforts to promote the use of health information technology and increased availability of PHRs in the clinical setting, PHR adoption rates remain relatively low overall. This article examines physician characteristics of high vs. low PHR adopters.
objectiveThe objectives of this study were to (1) examine PHR use patterns in the primary care setting, (2) identify physician characteristics affecting PHR adoption, and (3) explore physician perspectives encouraging and deterring use.
methodsInformation technology records provided data on primary care patient portal use at a large Midwestern academic medical center. Electronic surveys were administered to affiliated primary care physicians to measure their perceived use of patient portals. A focus group consisting of physician providers who completed the survey was used to further elucidate the trends and perceived utilization of the patient portal in the clinical setting.
resultsWhile they expended significant time communicating with patients using the portal, physicians generally overestimated the time spent per week on the system. Physicians who had been in practice longer estimated a higher average time spent on the system when compared to newer physicians. Patient portal activation rates and use decreased with increased years in practice. During the focus groups, physicians voiced motivation to use patient portals because they perceived improved patient communication and satisfaction with use. However, continued lack of reimbursement for time spent in portal communication was reported as a major barrier to providers' engagement with this technology. DISCUSSION: Physician endorsement and engagement is critical to achieve widespread adoption of PHRs. Such endorsement can be obtained through (1) providing rewards from health system employers for high use of PHRs, (2) providing financial reimbursement for time spent electronically communicating with patients via the PHR from federal initiatives incentivizing meaningful use of health information technology, (3) building robust support staff assistance for PHR communication into primary care workflows, and (4) integrating more PHR-specific education into providers' EHR training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26755897PMC4696089What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.