Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26755605›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Decanalization of wing development accompanied the evolution of large wings in high-altitude Drosophila.

Justin B Lack, Matthew J Monette, Evan J Johanning, Quentin D Sprengelmeyer, John E Pool

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The secrets of the extreme durability of odonata wings.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin B LackLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.
Matthew J MonetteLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.
Evan J JohanningLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.
Quentin D SprengelmeyerLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705.
John E PoolLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705 jpool@wisc.edu.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Institutional Training in the Genomic SciencesT32HG002760 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Qiongshi Lu · 2003 to 2026
$17.7M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007133 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PERNA, NICOLE T · 1985 to 2023
$16.5M
Causes and Consequences of Size Evolution in Drosophila melanogasterR01GM111797 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI POOL, JOHN E · 2014 to 2018
$1.4M
Adaptive evolution of gene expression in Drosophila melanogasterF32GM106594 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI LACK, JUSTIN BRITT · 2013 to 2015
$115k
NHGRI NIH HHS T32 HG002760NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM106594NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111797NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In higher organisms, the phenotypic impacts of potentially harmful or beneficial mutations are often modulated by complex developmental networks. Stabilizing selection may favor the evolution of developmental canalization--that is, robustness despite perturbation--to insulate development against environmental and genetic variability. In contrast, directional selection acts to alter the developmental process, possibly undermining the molecular mechanisms that buffer a trait's development, but this scenario has not been shown in nature. Here, we examined the developmental consequences of size increase in highland Ethiopian Drosophila melanogaster. Ethiopian inbred strains exhibited much higher frequencies of wing abnormalities than lowland populations, consistent with an elevated susceptibility to the genetic perturbation of inbreeding. We then used mutagenesis to test whether Ethiopian wing development is, indeed, decanalized. Ethiopian strains were far more susceptible to this genetic disruption of development, yielding 26 times more novel wing abnormalities than lowland strains in F2 males. Wing size and developmental perturbability cosegregated in the offspring of between-population crosses, suggesting that genes conferring size differences had undermined developmental buffering mechanisms. Our findings represent the first observation, to our knowledge, of morphological evolution associated with decanalization in the same tissue, underscoring the sensitivity of development to adaptive change.

Indexed as

AltitudeBiological EvolutionAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterFemaleMaleMutagenesisWings, Animaladaptive evolutiondevelopmental canalizationDrosophila melanogastergenetic robustnesswing

Identifiers

PMID26755605
PMCPMC4743785
OpenAlexW2236121129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.